Cited by 138Sleep and related disordersPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Structural validity of the Insomnia Severity Index: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Manzar, Md Dilshad, Jahrami, Haitham A., Bahammam, Ahmed S.·2021·Sleep Medicine Reviews

Abstract

The factor structure of the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) is discussed, with examples being drawn from about 13 disparate reported models. A systematic appraisal of procedural details of studies investigating the dimensionality of the ISI was performed. The databases CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, Medline, and PsycINFO were searched thoroughly, and all articles in English, published, and/or available online as of 14th March 2019, were included. Meta-analyses of Cronbach's alpha and structural validity measures were performed. Several inadequacies or omissions were found in analyses using the three groups of measures. Fifteen out of 20 studies did not employ either EFA or CFA, 10 studies did not report CFA, while five did not report EFA. The most common omissions related to multivariate normality, final model selection based on consideration of fit indices, parsimony, and failure to consider the theoretical construct in the final model selection. Meta-analysis showed that CFA outcome is more robust compared to EFA, two-factor solution is the vigorous presentation of dimensionality compared to a three-factor solution, and ISI has a high pooled Cronbach's alpha. Further validation of the disparate models of the ISI is needed with more comprehensive reporting guidelines, such as the one suggested in the present review.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101531

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manzar, M. D., Jahrami, H. A., & Bahammam, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Majmaah University (SA)
  • Ministry of Health (BH)
  • King Saud University (SA)
Corresponding author
Manzar, Md Dilshad
Venue
Sleep Medicine Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
60
Pages
101531
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3191158440
Cited by
138
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 22
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Majmaah University (R-2021-40)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Insomnia Severity Index, factor structure, dimensionality, structural validity, confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, psychometric validation, reporting guidelines
MeSH terms
Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review