Cited by 25Education, Achievement, and GiftednessMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesMathematics Education and Programs

Interest development during the first year at university: do mathematical beliefs predict interest in mathematics?

Liebendörfer, Michael, Schukajlow, Stanislaw·2017·ZDM

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11858-016-0827-3

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liebendörfer, M., & Schukajlow, S.
Affiliations
  • Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
  • University of Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Liebendörfer, Michael
  • Schukajlow, Stanislaw
Venue
ZDM
Published
2016-12-05
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
355-366
ISSN
  • 1615-679X (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-9690
  • 1863-9704
OpenAlex
W2559849301
Cited by
25
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ZDM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematics Education and Programs
Keywords
student interest in mathematics, mathematics beliefs, nature of mathematics, first-year students, transition from school to university mathematics, belief systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review