Cited by 95Cancer survivorship and careMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies

Mind-Body Interventions in Oncology

Carlson, Linda E., Bultz, Barry D.·2008·Current Treatment Options in Oncology

Abstract

Opinion statement A number of mind-body interventions have been studied for use with cancer patients, primarily measuring outcomes relating to pain control, anxiety reduction, and enhancing quality of life. This chapter defines the scope and characteristics of mind-body interventions, followed by a selective review of research indicating their appropriate use or cautions in cancer care. Mind-body interventions included are hypnosis, imagery/relaxation, meditation, yoga, and creative therapies. Current evidence supports the efficacy of hypnosis and imagery/relaxation for control of pain and anxiety during cancer treatments. Meditation is supported for reductions in stress and improvements in mood, quality of life, and sleep problems. There is a growing body of support for yoga from randomized controlled trials for improving quality of life, sleep, and mood. Creative therapies such as visual arts, dance, and music may help cancer patients express their feelings and cope with the demands of a cancer experience. Research on biological marker effects of mind-body therapies remains inconclusive. Study of mind-body interventions generally requires additional, methodologically rigorous investigation of how various interventions best assist patients during various phases of cancer survivorship, although a major benefit of these therapies lies in the opportunity for patients to self-select them.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11864-008-0064-2

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carlson, L. E., & Bultz, B. D.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Carlson, Linda E.
Venue
Current Treatment Options in Oncology
Published
2008-06
Volume
9
Issue
2-3
Pages
127-134
ISSN
  • 1527-2729 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-6277
OpenAlex
W2013328103
Cited by
95
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Treatment Options in Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alberta Cancer Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Keywords
mind-body interventions, cancer patients, hypnosis, guided imagery, relaxation, meditation, yoga, creative therapies, pain management, anxiety reduction, quality of life, sleep, stress, mood, biomarkers, cancer survivorship, coping
MeSH terms
Complementary Therapies, Humans, Hypnosis, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome, Imagery, Psychotherapy, Meditation, Mind-Body Therapies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review