Cited by 89Pain Management and Opioid UseCancer survivorship and carePalliative and Oncologic Care

The effectiveness of progressive muscle relaxation and interactive guided imagery as a pain-reducing intervention in advanced cancer patients: A multicentre randomised controlled non-pharmacological trial

De Paolis, Giulia, Naccarato, Alessia, Cibelli, Filomena, D'Alete, Andrea, Mastroianni, Chiara, Surdo, Laura, Casale, Giuseppe, Magnani, Caterina·2019·Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice

Abstract

Background and purpose Interactive guided imagery (IGI) and progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) are complementary therapies with a recognised positive effect on cancer pain relief. This multicentre randomised controlled trial was designed to assess the adjuvant effect of PMR-IGI in alleviating pain in a sample of hospice patients with terminal cancer. Materials and methods A total of 104 patients were randomised to two groups. Group A patients (n = 53) were administered the Revised Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS-r) and the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain immediately prior to (T1) and 2 h following an individual PMR-IGI session (T3). Group B patients (n = 51) received usual care and were assessed using the same tools. Acute pain episodes and rescue analgesics over the following 24 h were recorded. Results The Pain Intensity Difference (NRS at T3-NRS at T1) was 1.83 in group A and 0.55 in group B and was significant in both groups (p 0.05). Conclusion The results of this trial suggest that PMR-IGI may be considered as an effective adjuvant in alleviating pain-related distress in terminal cancer patients. Further studies should be performed to assess the effectiveness of repeated interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ctcp.2018.12.014

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence suggests potential benefits of PMR for people with advanced cancer, who reported significantly reduced pain intensity, distress, anxiety, and depression symptoms pre-post PMR.

    “Evidence also suggests potential benefits, specifically of PMR, for people with advanced cancer, who reported significantly reduced pain intensity, distress, anxiety, and depression symptoms pre-post PMR (De Paolis et al. 2019).”

    From Psychosocial and Integrative Oncology: Interventions Across the Disease Trajectory. (2023) · cites this paper as De Paolis et al. 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
De Paolis, G., Naccarato, A., Cibelli, F., D'Alete, A., Mastroianni, C., Surdo, L., Casale, G., & Magnani, C.
Affiliations
Roma Tre University (IT)
Venue
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
34
Pages
280-287
ISSN
1744-3881 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2908455676
Cited by
89
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
7.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Iris (Roma Tre University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
Keywords
progressive muscle relaxation, cancer pain, terminal cancer, hospice patients, non-pharmacological pain management, symptom distress, anxiety, depression, pain intensity, adjuvant therapy
MeSH terms
Autogenic Training, Humans, Neoplasms, Imagery, Psychotherapy, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review