Cited by 40Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Autoimmunity and familial risk of type 1 diabetes

Hämäläinen, Anu-Maaria, Knip, Mikael·2002·Current Diabetes Reports

Abstract

There is evidence that the process leading to type I diabetes may start in early infancy or already in utero. Even though diabetes-associated antibodies can be detected in up to half of the pregnancies of mothers with type I diabetes, pregnancy itself has no major effect on these antibodies. If such antibodies are present in the mother, they are transferred to the fetal circulation and are detectable in cord blood. Most of the transplacentally transferred antibodies disappear by 6 months of age, but may persist even longer. Antibodies present in cord blood may represent true induction of beta-cell autoimmunity, but such a phenomenon is extremely rare. The offspring of affected mothers have a 2% to 3% risk of type I diabetes, which is about one third of that in the offspring of affected fathers. A novel conceivable explanation is that exogenous insulin transplacentally transferred in immune complexes might lead to the induction of tolerance to insulin, which may be the primary autoantigen in type I diabetes. The possible protective or predisposing effect of diabetes-associated antibodies detectable at birth on progression to clinical type I diabetes later will be assessed in ongoing prospective birth cohort studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11892-002-0025-2

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Siblings of children with type 1 diabetes onset before age 5 have a three- to five-fold greater cumulative risk of diabetes by age 20 compared with siblings of children diagnosed between 5 and 15 years.

    “Siblings of children with onset of T1D before the age of 5 years have a three- to five-fold greater cumulative risk of diabetes by age 20 compared to siblings of children diagnosed between 5 and 15 years of age50.”

    From Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [50]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hämäläinen, A.-M., & Knip, M.
Affiliations
Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
Venue
Current Diabetes Reports
Published
2002-07
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
347-353
ISSN
  • 1534-4827 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0829
OpenAlex
W2115844970
Cited by
40
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Diabetes Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, islet autoimmunity, familial risk, maternal diabetes, pregnancy, cord blood antibodies, transplacental transfer, insulin tolerance, immune complexes, offspring risk, birth cohort studies
MeSH terms
Autoantibodies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Disease Susceptibility, Fathers, Female, Fetus, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Islets of Langerhans, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Diabetics, Risk Factors, Autoimmunity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review