Cited by 35Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for subacute low back pain: a systematic review

Mariano, Timothy Y., Urman, Richard D., Hutchison, Catherine A., Jamison, Robert N., Edwards, Robert R.·2018·Current Pain and Headache Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is a major source of physical and psychiatric morbidity and mortality, and the current overreliance on opioid analgesics has contributed to a burgeoning epidemic in the USA. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an empirically supported treatment for CLBP, but little information exists regarding its potential efficacy for CLBP's precursor condition, subacute low back pain (sALBP), defined here as having a 7-12-week duration. Earlier intervention with CBT at the sALBP stage could produce larger clinical benefits. This systematic review was undertaken to characterize and highlight this knowledge gap.Recent findings Of 240 unique articles identified by comprehensive database searches, only six prospective, sALBP-focused, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published within the past 20 years met criteria for inclusion in this review. These studies varied widely in their sample sizes, precise definition of sALBP, nature of CBT intervention, and outcome measures. Five of the six showed significant improvements associated with CBT, but the heterogeneity of the studies prevented quantitative comparisons. CBT has not been adequately studied as a potential early intervention treatment for sALBP patients. None of the six identified papers studied US civilians or leveraged innovations such as teletherapy-able to reach patients in remote or underserved areas-underscoring critical gaps in current back pain treatment. Given the severity of the US opioid epidemic, non-pharmacologic options such as CBT should be rigorously explored in the sALBP population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11916-018-0669-5

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mariano, T. Y., Urman, R. D., Hutchison, C. A., Jamison, R. N., & Edwards, R. R.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Mariano, Timothy Y.
Venue
Current Pain and Headache Reports
Published
2018-02-23
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
15-15
ISSN
  • 1531-3433 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-3081
OpenAlex
W2789820066
Cited by
35
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Pain and Headache Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, subacute low back pain, chronic low back pain, early intervention, opioid epidemic, non-pharmacological treatment, external beam radiotherapy, randomized controlled trials
MeSH terms
Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Low Back Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review