The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Manipulation of Scientific Digital Images
Open accessAbstract
Digital imaging has provided scientists with new opportunities to acquire and manipulate data using techniques that were difficult or impossible to employ in the past. Because digital images are easier to manipulate than film images, new problems have emerged. One growing concern in the scientific community is that digital images are not being handled with sufficient care. The problem is twofold: (1) the very small, yet troubling, number of intentional falsifications that have been identified, and (2) the more common unintentional, inappropriate manipulation of images for publication. Journals and professional societies have begun to address the issue with specific digital imaging guidelines. Unfortunately, the guidelines provided often do not come with instructions to explain their importance. Thus they deal with what should or should not be done, but not the associated ‘why’ that is required for understanding the rules. This article proposes 12 guidelines for scientific digital image manipulation and discusses the technical reasons behind these guidelines. These guidelines can be incorporated into lab meetings and graduate student training in order to provoke discussion and begin to bring an end to the culture of “data beautification”.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What's in a picture? The temptation of image manipulation
Rossner, M., & Yamada, K. M. (2004) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.200406019 · Cited by 412
Pearson, H. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/434952a · Cited by 67
Cited by
Alexander, S. P. H., Roberts, R. E., Broughton, B. R. S., Sobey, C. G., George, C. H., Stanford, S. C., Cirino, G., Docherty, J. R., Giembycz, M. A., Hoyer, D., et al. (2018) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bph.14112 · Cited by 891
Tutorial: guidance for quantitative confocal microscopy
Jonkman, J., Brown, C. M., Wright, G. D., Anderson, K. I., & North, A. J. (2020) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-020-0313-9 · Cited by 401
Big Data and Digitalization in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues
Favaretto, M., Shaw, D., De Clercq, E., Joda, T., & Elger, B. S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17072495 · Cited by 94
Digital images are data: and should be treated as such
Cromey, D. W. (2012) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-056-4_1 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cromey, D. W.
- Venue
- Science and Engineering Ethics
- Published
- 2010-06-22
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 639-667
- ISSN
- 1353-3452 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5546
- OpenAlex
- W1989319638
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Manipulation of Scientific Digital Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11948-010-9201-y
- The paper
- Cromey, D. W. (2010). Avoiding Twisted Pixels: Ethical Guidelines for the Appropriate Use and Manipulation of Scientific Digital Images. Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-010-9201-y
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.