Cited by 136Ethics and Social Impacts of AIGreen IT and SustainabilityBig Data Technologies and Applications

Big Data, Big Waste? A Reflection on the Environmental Sustainability of Big Data Initiatives

Open access
Lucivero, Federica·2020·Science and Engineering Ethics

Abstract

This paper addresses a problem that has so far been neglected by scholars investigating the ethics of Big Data and policy makers: that is the ethical implications of Big Data initiatives’ environmental impact. Building on literature in environmental studies, cultural studies and Science and Technology Studies, the article draws attention to the physical presence of data, the material configuration of digital service, and the space occupied by data. It then explains how this material and situated character of data raises questions concerning the ethics of the increasingly fashionable Big Data discourses. It argues that attention should be paid to (1) the vocabulary currently used when discussing the governance of data initiatives; (2) the internal tension between current data initiatives and environmental policies; (3) issues of fair distribution. The article explains how taking into account these aspects would allow for a more responsible behaviour in the context of data storage and production.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11948-019-00171-7

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a world prone to climate crisis, the environmental impact of AI might well constrain its deployment, at least if sustainability becomes a serious parameter in economic activity.

    “Similarly, in a world prone to climate crisis, the environmental impact of AI (Corbett 2018;Dhar 2020;Lucivero 2020;Strubell et al. 2020; van Wynsberghe 2021) might well constrain its deployment, at least if sustainability becomes a serious parameter in economic activity (Nishant et al. 2020 for a contrary optimistic view).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Holt J Vonderau P Parks L Starosielski N Where the internet lives Signal traffic 2015 Champaign University of Illinois Press 71 93

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lucivero, F.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Lucivero, Federica
Venue
Science and Engineering Ethics
Published
2019-12-23
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
1009-1030
ISSN
  • 1353-3452 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-5546
OpenAlex
W2998403260
Cited by
136
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 4
FWCI
19.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science and Engineering Ethics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (203132/Z/16/Z)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Big Data Technologies and Applications
Keywords
big data, environmental sustainability, data ethics, digital services, data storage, data governance, environmental policy, fair distribution, responsible data practices
MeSH terms
Big Data, Technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review