Cited by 25Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigitalization, Law, and RegulationLegal and Labor Studies

A principle‐based approach to AI: The case for European Union and Italy

Open access
Corea, Francesco, Fossa, Fabio, Loreggia, Andrea, Quintarelli, Stefano, Sapienza, Salvatore·2023·AI & SOCIETY

Abstract

Abstract As Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes more and more pervasive in our everyday life, new questions arise about its ethical and social impacts. Such issues concern all stakeholders involved in or committed to the design, implementation, deployment, and use of the technology. The present document addresses these preoccupations by introducing and discussing a set of practical obligations and recommendations for the development of applications and systems based on AI techniques. With this work we hope to contribute to spreading awareness on the many social challenges posed by AI and encouraging the establishment of good practices throughout the relevant social areas. As points of novelty, the paper elaborates on an integrated view that combines both human rights and ethical concepts to reap the benefits of the two approaches. Moreover, it proposes innovative recommendations, such as those on redress and governance, which add further insight to the debate. Finally, it incorporates a specific focus on the Italian Constitution, thus offering an example of how core legislations of Member States might contribute to further specify and enrich the EU normative framework on AI.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00146-022-01453-8

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rationale behind responsible AI governance is to ensure that automated systems including ML/DL technologies support individuals and organizations in achieving long-term objectives while safeguarding all stakeholders' interests.

    “The rationale behind responsible AI governance is to ensure that automated systems including ML/DL technologies, are supporting individuals and organizations in achieving their long terms objectives, whist safeguarding the interests of all stakeholders (Corea et al., 2022;Hickok, 2022).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Capucha L, Nunes N, Calado A (2020) Artificial intelligence as a resil- ient tool for fighting inequalities in the covid-19 crisis. Eur J Eng Form Sci 4(2):10-19
  2. Kharbat FF, Alshawabkeh A, Woolsey ML (2021) Identifying gaps in using artificial intelligence to support students with intellectual disabilities from education and health perspectives. Aslib J Inf Manag 73(1):101-128. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1108/ AJIM-02-2020- 0054/ full/ html · DOI
  3. Korinek A, Stiglitz JE (2019) Artificial intelligence and its implica- tions for income distribution and unemployment. In: Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (eds) The economics of artificial intelligence. Communications in computer and information science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 349-390
  4. McGregor S (2021) Preventing repeated real world AI failures by cata- loging incidents: the AI incident database. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell 35:15458-15463
  5. Pasquale F (2015) The black box society. Harvard University Press, Harvard
  6. Rachels J (1975) Why privacy is important. Philos Public Aff 4(4):323-333
  7. IEEE (2017) Ethically aligned design: a vision for prioritizing human well-being with autonomous and intelligent systems, version 2. https:// stand ards. ieee. org/ conte nt/ dam/ ieee-stand ards/ stand ards/ web/ docum ents/ other/ ead_ v2. pdf
  8. Loreggia A, Mattei N, Quintarelli S (2020) Artificial intelligence research for fighting political polarisation: a research agenda. In: Proceedings of the first international forum on digital and democracy. Towards a sustainable evolution 2020, Venice, Italy, December 10-11, 2020, volume 2781 of CEUR workshop pro- ceedings, p 24-33
  9. Pham QC, Madhavan R, Righetti L, Smart W, Chatila R (2018) The impact of robotics and automation on working conditions and employment. In: IEEE robotics and automation magazine June, p 126-128. https:// ieeex plore. ieee. org/ docum ent/ 83854 01
  10. Rossi A, Ducato R, Haapio H, Passera S (2019) Legal design patterns: towards a new language for legal information design. In: 22nd international legal informatics symposium IRIS 2019. https:// cris. unibo. it/ retri eve/ handle/ 11585/ 673870/ 438421/ legal_ design_ patte rns_ new_ langu age_ legal_ info_ design. pdf SAE International (2018) J3016: taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. https:// www. sae. org/ stand ards/ conte nt/ j3016_ 201806/

Authors
Corea, F., Fossa, F., Loreggia, A., Quintarelli, S., & Sapienza, S.
Affiliations
  • Politecnico di Milano (IT)
  • University of Brescia (IT)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Loreggia, Andrea
Venue
AI & SOCIETY
Published
2022-05-25
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
521-535
ISSN
  • 0951-5666 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-5655
OpenAlex
W4281487808
Cited by
25
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AI & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Università degli Studi di Brescia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
Keywords
AI ethics, AI governance, human rights, AI regulation, EU AI policy, Italian Constitution, redress, best practices, societal impact of AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review