The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone Graft Harvest Using a New Intramedullary System
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: Obtaining autogenous bone graft from the iliac crest can entail substantial morbidity. Alternatively, bone graft can be harvested from long bones using an intramedullary (IM) harvesting system. We measured bone graft volume obtained from the IM canals of the femur and tibia and documented the complications of the harvesting technique. Donor site pain and the union rate were compared between the IM and the traditional iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) harvest. Forty-one patients (23 male, 18 female) with an average age of 44.9 years (range, 15-78 years) had graft harvested from long bones using an IM harvest system (femoral donor site, 37 patients; tibial donor site, four patients). Forty patients (23 male, 17 female; average age, 46.4 years; range, 15-77 years) underwent anterior ICBG harvest. We administered patient surveys to both groups to determine pain intensity and frequency. IM group reported lower pain scores than the ICBG group during all postoperative periods. Mean graft volume for the IM harvest group was 40.3 mL (range, 25-75 mL) (graft volume was not obtained for the ICBG group). Using an intramedullary system to harvest autogenous bone graft from the long bones is safe provided a meticulous technique is used. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/bf03193146 · Cited by 65,971
Cited by
Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions — A 21st Century Perspective
Henkel, J., Woodruff, M. A., Epari, D. R., Steck, R., Glatt, V., Dickinson, I. C., Choong, P. F. M., Schuetz, M. A., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Bone Research · doi:10.4248/br201303002 · Cited by 907
Baldwin, P., Li, D. J., Auston, D. A., Mir, H. S., Yoon, R. S., & Koval, K. J. (2019) · Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma · doi:10.1097/bot.0000000000001420 · Cited by 773
Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration
Vo, T. N., Kasper, F. K., & Mikos, A. G. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.016 · Cited by 666
Autologous bone graft: Is it still the gold standard?
Schmidt, A. H. (2021) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2021.01.043 · Cited by 592
Autologous Bone Graft: Properties and Techniques
Pape, H. C., Evans, A., & Kobbe, P. (2010) · Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma · doi:10.1097/bot.0b013e3181cec4a1 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Belthur, M. V., Conway, J. D., Jindal, G., Ranade, A., & Herzenberg, J. E.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 466
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2973-2980
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972607780
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone Graft Harvest Using a New Intramedullary System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11999-008-0538-3
- The paper
- Belthur, M. V., Conway, J. D., Jindal, G., Ranade, A., & Herzenberg, J. E. (2008). Bone Graft Harvest Using a New Intramedullary System. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0538-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.