The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions — A 21st Century Perspective
Open accessAbstract
The role of Bone Tissue Engineering in the field of Regenerative Medicine has been the topic of substantial research over the past two decades. Technological advances have improved orthopaedic implants and surgical techniques for bone reconstruction. However, improvements in surgical techniques to reconstruct bone have been limited by the paucity of autologous materials available and donor site morbidity. Recent advances in the development of biomaterials have provided attractive alternatives to bone grafting expanding the surgical options for restoring the form and function of injured bone. Specifically, novel bioactive (second generation) biomaterials have been developed that are characterised by controlled action and reaction to the host tissue environment, whilst exhibiting controlled chemical breakdown and resorption with an ultimate replacement by regenerating tissue. Future generations of biomaterials (third generation) are designed to be not only osteoconductive but also osteoinductive, i.e. to stimulate regeneration of host tissues by combining tissue engineering and in situ tissue regeneration methods with a focus on novel applications. These techniques will lead to novel possibilities for tissue regeneration and repair. At present, tissue engineered constructs that may find future use as bone grafts for complex skeletal defects, whether from post-traumatic, degenerative, neoplastic or congenital/developmental “origin” require osseous reconstruction to ensure structural and functional integrity. Engineering functional bone using combinations of cells, scaffolds and bioactive factors is a promising strategy and a particular feature for future development in the area of hybrid materials which are able to exhibit suitable biomimetic and mechanical properties. This review will discuss the state of the art in this field and what we can expect from future generations of bone regeneration concepts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2012) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.20138 · Cited by 10,679
The return of a forgotten polymer—Polycaprolactone in the 21st century
Woodruff, M. A., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2010) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 · Cited by 4,033
Self-citationLaurencin, C., Khan, Y., & El-Amin, S. F. (2006) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/17434440.3.1.49 · Cited by 716
Lam, C. X. F., Savalani, M. M., Teoh, S.-H., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2008) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-6041/3/3/034108 · Cited by 444
Self-citationBone tissue engineering: from bench to bedside
Woodruff, M. A., Lange, C., Reichert, J., Berner, A., Chen, F., Fratzl, P., Schantz, J.-T., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2012) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(12)70194-3 · Cited by 182
Self-citation
Cited by
Normal Bone Anatomy and Physiology
Clarke, B. (2008) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.04151206 · Cited by 2,192
Scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: state of the art and new perspectives
Roseti, L., Parisi, V., Petretta, M., Cavallo, C., Desando, G., Bartolotti, I., & Grigolo, B. (2017) · Materials Science and Engineering: C · doi:10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.017 · Cited by 1,320
Alginate hydrogels for bone tissue engineering, from injectables to bioprinting: A review
Hernández-González, A. C., Téllez-Jurado, L., & Rodríguez-Lorenzo, L. M. (2020) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115514 · Cited by 549
Shahbazi, M.-A., Faghfouri, L., Ferreira, M. P. A., Figueiredo, P., Maleki, H., Sefat, F., Hirvonen, J., & Santos, H. A. (2020) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c9cs00283a · Cited by 523
Fabrication of physical and chemical crosslinked hydrogels for bone tissue engineering
Xue, X., Hu, Y., Wang, S., Chen, X., Jiang, Y., & Su, J. (2022) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.10.029 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Henkel, J., Woodruff, M. A., Epari, D. R., Steck, R., Glatt, V., Dickinson, I. C., Choong, P. F. M., Schuetz, M. A., & Hutmacher, D. W.
- Venue
- Bone Research
- Published
- 2013-09-25
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 216-248
- ISSN
- 2095-4700 (ISSN-L)
- 2095-6231
- OpenAlex
- W1481452492
- Cited by
- 907
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions — A 21st Century Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4248/br201303002
- The paper
- Henkel, J., Woodruff, M. A., Epari, D. R., Steck, R., Glatt, V., Dickinson, I. C., Choong, P. F. M., Schuetz, M. A., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013). Bone Regeneration Based on Tissue Engineering Conceptions — A 21st Century Perspective. Bone Research. https://doi.org/10.4248/br201303002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.