Cited by 49Diabetes Management and ResearchPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersPain Mechanisms and Treatments

The impact of glycemic variability on diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Jin, Heung Yong, Lee, Kyung Ae, Park, Tae Sun·2016·Endocrine

Abstract

Mean glucose values alone cannot explain the patterns of morbidity and mortality due to dysglycemia in diabetes. Development of continuous glucose monitoring systems has improved the analysis and interpretation of glycemic variability. The roles of glycemic components other than constant hyperglycemia in diabetic complications must be investigated because large clinical studies have indicated that risk factors besides the average glucose value of HbA1c are involved in chronic macrocomplications/microcomplications of diabetes. Among these complications, the pathogenesis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy is particularly complex, and several factors related to glucose and nonglucose pathways have been suggested as risk factors. There is little information regarding the effect of glycemic variability on diabetic peripheral neuropathy, unlike other microvascular complications of retinopathy and nephropathy, and whether glycemic variability causes harmful effects is still a matter of debate. In this review, we discuss the relationships between glycemic variability and diabetic peripheral neuropathy, focusing on somatosensory peripheral neuropathies rather than autonomic neuropathies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12020-016-1005-7

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is inconsistency in the relationship between glucose variability and diabetic peripheral neuropathy in the literature.

    “There is inconsistency in the relationship between glucose variability and DPN in the literature, and some research indicates that for type 2 DM, glucose variability may be regarded as a marker of beta-cell function rather than direct cause of DPN.37–39”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jin, H. Y., Lee, K. A., & Park, T. S.
Affiliations
Jeonbuk National University Hospital (KR)
Corresponding author
Park, Tae Sun
Venue
Endocrine
Published
2016-07-06
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
643-648
ISSN
  • 0969-711X (ISSN-L)
  • 1355-008X
  • 1559-0100
OpenAlex
W2472726498
Cited by
49
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chonbuk National University Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
glycemic variability, diabetic peripheral neuropathy, continuous glucose monitoring, HbA1c, microvascular complications, macrovascular complications, hyperglycemia, risk factors, diabetes mellitus
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetic Neuropathies, Humans, Peripheral Nervous System Diseases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review