Cited by 56Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The Pak1 Kinase: An Important Regulator of Neuronal Morphology and Function in the Developing Forebrain

Nikolić, Margareta·2008·Molecular Neurobiology

Abstract

The mammalian central nervous system (CNS) represents a highly complex unit, the correct function of which relies on the appropriate differentiation and survival of its neurones. It is becoming apparent that the Rho family of small GTPases and their downstream targets have a major function in regulating CNS development. Among the effectors, the role of the Pak family of kinases, especially Pak1, is becoming increasingly evident. Although highest levels of Pak1 expression and activation are detected in the developing nervous system, much remains undiscovered concerning its function in neurones. This review summarises what is currently known regarding the biological and molecular role of Pak1 in the mammalian forebrain. It emphasises the importance of Pak1 in regulating neuronal polarity, morphology, migration and synaptic function. Consequently, there are also strong indications that Pak1 is required for normal cognitive function. Furthermore, loss of Pak1 has been associated with the progression of neurodegenerative disorders, particularly Alzheimer's disease, while up-regulation and de-regulation may be responsible for oncogenic transformation of support cells within the CNS, especially astrocyte progenitors. Together, these new and exciting findings encourage the future exploration into the function of Pak1 in the nervous system, thus, paving the way for novel strategies towards improved diagnosis and therapeutic treatment of diseases that affect the CNS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12035-008-8032-1

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nikolić, M.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Nikolić, Margareta
Venue
Molecular Neurobiology
Published
2008-06
Volume
37
Issue
2-3
Pages
187-202
ISSN
  • 0893-7648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1182
OpenAlex
W2027848727
Cited by
56
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Axon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
Rho GTPases, neuronal polarity, neuronal morphology, neuronal migration, synaptic function, forebrain development, cognitive function, Alzheimer's disease, neurodegeneration, oncogenic transformation, central nervous system development
MeSH terms
Animals, Cognition, Enzyme Activation, Humans, Neurons, Stem Cells, Signal Transduction, Central Nervous System Neoplasms, Prosencephalon, Cell Polarity, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Cell Proliferation, p21-Activated Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review