CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 360Language and cultural evolutionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorEvolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Five Misunderstandings About Cultural Evolution

Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Richerson, Peter J.·2008·Human Nature
DOI 10.1007/s12110-008-9037-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Recent debates about memetics have revealed some widespread misunderstandings about Darwinian approaches to cultural evolution. Drawing from these debates, this paper disputes five common claims: (1) mental representations are rarely discrete, and therefore models that assume discrete, gene-like particles (i.e., replicators) are useless; (2) replicators are necessary for cumulative, adaptive evolution; (3) content-dependent psychological biases are the only important processes that affect the spread of cultural representations; (4) the "cultural fitness" of a mental representation can be inferred from its successful transmission; and (5) selective forces only matter if the sources of variation are random. We close by sketching the outlines of a unified evolutionary science of culture.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12110-008-9037-1

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 108 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Atran, S. (2002). The religious landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  2. Conot, R. E. (1979). A streak of luck. New York: Seaview Books (distributed by Simon and Schuster).
  3. Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. London: Penguin Press.
  4. Hager, T. (2007). The demon under the microscope. New York: Three Rivers Press.
  5. Lipo, C. P. (Ed.) (2006). Mapping our ancestors. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
  6. McElreath, R., & Boyd, R. (2007). Modeling the evolution of social behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  7. Taylor, G. (1996). Cultural selection. New York: Basic Books.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 359

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Henrich, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Henrich, Joseph
ORCID
Venue
Human Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2008-04-19
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
119-137
ISSN
  • 1045-6767 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4776
DOI
10.1007/s12110-008-9037-1
OpenAlex
W2126674924
Cited by
360
References
108
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 16
FWCI
407.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Human Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
Keywords
cultural evolution, memetics, replicators, mental representation, cumulative cultural evolution, cultural transmission, psychological biases, Darwinian evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review