The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Five Misunderstandings About Cultural Evolution
Abstract
Recent debates about memetics have revealed some widespread misunderstandings about Darwinian approaches to cultural evolution. Drawing from these debates, this paper disputes five common claims: (1) mental representations are rarely discrete, and therefore models that assume discrete, gene-like particles (i.e., replicators) are useless; (2) replicators are necessary for cumulative, adaptive evolution; (3) content-dependent psychological biases are the only important processes that affect the spread of cultural representations; (4) the "cultural fitness" of a mental representation can be inferred from its successful transmission; and (5) selective forces only matter if the sources of variation are random. We close by sketching the outlines of a unified evolutionary science of culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“it is possible for the replication of cultural traits to be a systemic process without the need for gene-like replicators (Henrich et al. 2008; Laland & Brown 2011).”
From Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change (2014) · cites this paper as Henrich et al. 2008
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,670
(1976) · Cited by 10,423
Culture and the Evolutionary Process
Griesemer, J. R., Boyd, R. T., & Richerson, P. J. (1986) · Ornithological Applications · doi:10.2307/1367778 · Cited by 7,133
Self-citationGuns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies.
Hardin, G., & Diamond, J. M. (1997) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/2137390 · Cited by 4,983
PINKER, S. (1999) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb08538.x · Cited by 3,738
The Psychological Foundations of Culture
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992) · The Adapted Mind · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195060232.003.0002 · Cited by 3,627
Not by Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution
Levinson, M. H. (2006) · ETC.: A Review of General Semantics · doi:10.66774/etc_6303_351 · Cited by 3,581
Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed Human Evolution
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2004) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226712130.001.0001 · Cited by 2,793
Self-citationHenrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s1090-5138(00)00071-4 · Cited by 2,500 · cited 2×
“However, summarizing evidence from across the social sciences, Henrich and Gil-White (2001) show that humans are quite selective in picking the individuals they will learn from, or be influenced by ( " imitate, " if you will).”
BackgroundSelf-citationDENNETT, D. C. (1995) · The Sciences · doi:10.1002/j.2326-1951.1995.tb03633.x · Cited by 1,975
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Atran, S. (2002). The religious landscape. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Conot, R. E. (1979). A streak of luck. New York: Seaview Books (distributed by Simon and Schuster).
- Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. London: Penguin Press.
- Hager, T. (2007). The demon under the microscope. New York: Three Rivers Press.
- Lipo, C. P. (Ed.) (2006). Mapping our ancestors. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
- McElreath, R., & Boyd, R. (2007). Modeling the evolution of social behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Taylor, G. (1996). Cultural selection. New York: Basic Books.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beyond DNA: integrating inclusive inheritance into an extended theory of evolution
Danchin, É., Charmantier, A., Champagne, F. A., Mesoudi, A., Pujol, B., & Blanchet, S. (2011) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3028 · Cited by 860
“After the capacity for social learning has evolved, the social component of inherited phenotypic variation that is defined as cultur”
BackgroundEcology in an anthropogenic biosphere
Ellis, E. C. (2015) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/14-2274.1 · Cited by 641
Kline, M. A. (2015) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x14000090 · Cited by 486
Atran, S., & Henrich, J. (2010) · Biological Theory · doi:10.1162/biot_a_00018 · Cited by 459
Self-citationThe Origins and Psychology of Human Cooperation
Henrich, J., & Muthukrishna, M. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-081920-042106 · Cited by 457
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Henrich, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Henrich, Joseph
- Venue
- Human Nature
- Published
- 2008-04-19
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-137
- ISSN
- 1045-6767 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-4776
- OpenAlex
- W2126674924
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 108
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 407.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Human Nature (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
- Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
- Keywords
- cultural evolution, memetics, replicators, mental representation, cumulative cultural evolution, cultural transmission, psychological biases, Darwinian evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
