Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 21

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Causes, Consequences, and Kin Bias of Human Group Fissions

Walker, Robert S., Hill, Kim R.·2014·Human Nature
DOI 10.1007/s12110-014-9209-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Fissions of human communities are monumental occasions with consequences for cultural and genetic variation and divergence through time by means of serial founder effects. An ethnographic review shows that most human group fissions are fueled primarily by internal political conflict and secondarily by resource scarcity. As found for other social animals, human fissions lead to subgroups that have higher levels of relatedness as compared with the original community because of kin-biased assortment known as the lineal effect. Fission processes that increase the average relatedness of subgroups are important because relatedness governs how strongly kin/group selection favors social behaviors such as warfare, peacekeeping, and other forms of collection action. However, random individual assortment is not an appropriate null model for evaluating lineage assortment because nuclear families and extended households are expected to remain together, which in and of itself forces higher relatedness in smaller subgroups. We develop a lineage assortment index where low values represent subgroups with coefficients of relatedness near those expected if nuclear and extended households had chosen to associate into random groupings. Two fissions of Ache villages (Paraguay) are examples of this type of fission with a low lineage assortment index not significantly different from zero as evaluated with controlled simulations. On the other extreme, a lineage assortment index near unity represents…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12110-014-9209-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. Altmann, J., Hausfater, G., & Atmann, S. A. (1985). Demography of Amboseli baboons. American Journal of Primatology, 8, 113–125. · DOI
  2. Alvard, M. (2009). Kinship and cooperation. Human Nature, 20, 394–416. · DOI
  3. Archie, E. A., Moss, C. J., & Alberts, S. C. (2006). The ties that bind: genetic relatedness predicts the fission and fusion of social groups in wild African elephants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 273, 513–522. · DOI
  4. Århem, K. (1981). Makuna social organization: A study in descent, alliance, and the formation of corporate groups in the north-western Amazon. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
  5. Carneiro, R. (1987). Village splitting as a function of population size. In L. Donald (Ed.), Themes in ethnology and culture history. Meerut: Archana Publications.
  6. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., Piazza, A., Menozzi, P., & Mountain, J. (1988). Reconstruction of human evolution: bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 85, 6002–6006. · DOI
  7. Chagnon, N. A. (1975). Genealogy, solidarity, and relatedness: limits to local group size and patterns of fissioning in an expanding population. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 19, 95–110.
  8. Chagnon, N. A. (1976). Fission in an Amazonian tribe. New York Academy of Sciences, 16(1), 14–18.
  9. Chagnon, N. A. (1979). Mate competition, favoring close kin, and village fissioning among the Yanomamö Indians. In N. A. Chagnon & W. A. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human behavior. North Scituate: Duxbury Press.
  10. Chagnon, N. A., & Bugos, P. E. (1979). Kin selection and conflict: An analysis of a Yanomamo ax fight. In N. A. Chagnon & W. A. Irons (Eds.), Evolutionary biology and human behavior (pp. 213–288). North Scituate: Duxbury Press.
  11. Chapais, B. (2008). Primeval kinship: How pair bonding gave birth to human society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. · DOI
  12. Chepko-Sade, B. D., & Olivier, T. J. (1979). Coefficient of genetic relationship and the probability of intragenealogical fission in Macaca mulatta. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 5(3), 263–278. · DOI
  13. Dumont, J.-P. (1978). The headman and I: Ambiguity and ambivalence in the fieldworking experience. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  14. Early, J. D., & Peters, J. F. (2000). The Xilixana Yanomami of the Amazon: History, social structure, and population dynamics. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
  15. Eggan, F. (1950). Social organization of the Western Pueblos. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  16. Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1940). The Nuer: A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people. Oxford: Clarendon.
  17. Fix, A. G. (1975). Fission-fusion and lineal effect: aspects of the population structure of the Semai Senoi of Malaysia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 43, 295–302. · DOI
  18. Fix, A. G. (1999). Migration and colonization in human microevolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Fix, A. G. (2004). Kin-structured migration: causes and consequences. American Journal of Human Biology, 16, 387–394. · DOI
  20. Freedman, D. G. (1984). Village fissioning, human diversity, and ethnocentrism. Political Psychology, 5(4), 629–634. · DOI
  21. Goodenough, W. H. (1951). Property, kin, and community on Truk. New Haven: Yale University Publications.
  22. Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behavior, parts I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–52. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Hill, K. R., & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  24. Hill, K. R., Walker, R. S., Bozicevic, M., Eder, J., Headland, T., et al. (2011). Co-residence patterns in hunter-gatherer societies show unique human social structure. Science, 331, 1286–1289. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hoogland, J. L. (1995). The black-tailed prairie dog: Social life of a burrowing mammal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  26. Hunley, K. L., Spence, J. E., & Merriwether, D. A. (2008). The impact of group fissions on genetic structure in native South America and implications for human evolution. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 135, 195–205. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Kaplan, J. O. (1975). The Piaroa: A people of the Orinoco Basin. Oxford: Clarendon.
  28. Keesing, R. M. (1978). Elota’s story: The life and times of a Solomon Islands big man. New York: Henry Holt & Company.
  29. Kelly, R. L. (2013). The lifeways of hunter-gatherers: The foraging spectrum (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  30. Levy, J. (1992). Orayvi revisited: social stratification in an “egalitarian” society. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
  31. Lewis, M. P., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds) (2013). Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 17th edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com .
  32. Matta, R. (1970). A divided world: Social structure of the Apinayé. PhD dissertation. Harvard University.
  33. Maybury-Lewis, D. H. P. (1967). Akwa-Shavante society. Oxford: Clarendon.
  34. Melatti, J. C. (1970). O sistema social Craô. PhD dissertation. Sao Paulo: Universidade de Sao Paulo.
  35. Melnick, D. J. (1987). The genetic consequences of primate social organization: a review of macaques, baboons and vervet monkeys. Genetics, 73, 117–135.
  36. Melnick, D. J., & Kidd, K. K. (1983). The genetic consequences of social group fission in a wild population of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 12, 229–236. · DOI
  37. Metheny, J. D., Kalcounis-Ruepell, M. C., Bondo, K. J., & Brigham, R. M. (2008). A genetic analysis of group movement in an isolated population of tree-roosting bats. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 275(1648), 2265–2272. · DOI
  38. Neel, J. V. (1967). The genetic structure of primitive human populations. Journal of Human Genetics, 12, 1–16.
  39. Neel, J. V., & Salzano, F. M. (1966). Further studies on the Xavante Indians: some hypotheses-generalizations resulting from these studies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 19(4), 554–574.
  40. Nsubuga, A. M., Robbins, M. M., Boesch, C., & Vigilant, L. (2008). Patterns of paternity and group fission in wild multimale mountain gorilla groups. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 135, 263–274. · DOI · Paper page
  41. O’Leary, T. J., Levinson, D., Hays, T. E., Hockings, P., Bennett, L. A., et al. (Eds.). (1994). Encyclopedia of world cultures. New York: Hall Publishing.
  42. Oliver, D. (1955). A Solomon Islands society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. · DOI
  43. Olsen, C. L. (1976) The demography of new colony formation in a human isolate: An analysis and history. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
  44. Olsen, C. L. (1987). The demography of colony fission from 1878–1970 among the Hutterites of North America. American Anthropologist, 89, 823–837. · DOI
  45. Rappaport, R. A. (1968). Pigs for the ancestors: Ritual in the ecology of a New Guinea people. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  46. Rodseth, L., Wrangham, R. W., Harrigan, A. M., & Smuts, B. B. (1991). The human community as a primate society. Current Anthropology, 32(3), 221–254. · DOI
  47. Sahlins, M. D. (1961). The segmentary lineage: an organization of predatory expansion. American Anthropologist, 63(2), 322–345. · DOI · Paper page
  48. Silva, M. F. (2009). Romance de primas e primos: Uma etnografia do parentesco Waimiri-Atroari. Manaus: Valer Editora.
  49. Smouse, P. E., Vitzthum, V. J., & Neel, J. V. (1981). The impact of random and lineal fission on the genetic divergence of small human groups: a case study among the Yanomama. Genetics, 98, 179–197. · DOI · Paper page
  50. Templeton, A. R. (1980). The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Genetics, 94, 1011–1038. · DOI
  51. Titiev, M. (1972). The Hopi Indians of Old Oraibi: Change and continuity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  52. Turner, V. W. (1957). Schism and continuity in an African society. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  53. Van Horn, R. C., Buchan, J. C., Altmann, J., & Alberts, S. C. (2007). Divided destinies: group choice by female savannah baboons during social group fission. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 1823–1837. · DOI
  54. Verswijver, G. (1992). The club-fighters of the Amazon: Warfare among the Kaiapo Indians of Central Brazil. Gent: Rijksuniversiteit Te Gent.
  55. Waterman, J. M. (2002). Delayed maturity, group fission and the limits of group size in female Cape ground squirrels (Xerus inauris: Sciuridae). Journal of Zoology, 256, 113–120. · DOI
  56. Whiteley, P. M. (1988). Deliberate acts: Changing Hopi culture through the Oraibi split. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
  57. Wright, S. (1922). Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. American Naturalist, 56, 330–338. · DOI

Cited by

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Walker, R. S., & Hill, K. R.
Venue
Human Nature
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2014-07-24
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
465-475
ISSN
  • 1045-6767
  • 1936-4776
DOI
10.1007/s12110-014-9209-0
Cited by
21
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review