Cited by 174Behavioral Health and InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Eliciting salient beliefs in research on the theory of planned behaviour: the effect of question wording

Sutton, Stephen, French, David P., Hennings, Susie J., Mitchell, Jo, Wareham, Nicholas J., Griffin, Simon, Hardeman, Wendy, Kinmonth, Ann Louise·2003·Current Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-003-1019-1

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Beliefs elicitation is the preferred method for contextualizing theories of behavior to a specific setting, population, and behavior.

    “The process is called beliefs elicitation [42, 142-145], and it is the preferred method for contextualizing theories of behavior to a specific setting (health care), with a new population (clinicians), and a new behavior of interest (health IT use) [102].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sutton, S., French, D. P., Hennings, S. J., Mitchell, J., Wareham, N. J., Griffin, S., Hardeman, W., & Kinmonth, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2003-09
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
234-251
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 0737-8262
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W2021407991
Cited by
174
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
theory of planned behavior, theory of reasoned action, salient beliefs, question wording, decision rules, physical activity intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review