Cited by 230Cardiac Health and Mental HealthPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Association Between Type D Personality and Prognosis in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Open access
Grande, Gesine, Romppel, Matthias, Barth, Jürgen·2012·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since 1995, the association of type D personality and mortality in patients with cardiovascular diseases has been increasingly investigated. PURPOSE: The aim of this meta-analysis was to integrate conflicting results and to examine possible moderators of this association. METHODS: Prospective studies assessing type D personality and hard endpoints were selected and pooled in meta-analyses. Cardiovascular diagnosis, type and quality of adjustment, and publication date were examined in moderator analyses. RESULTS: Twelve studies on patients with cardiovascular diseases (N = 5,341) were included. Pooled crude and adjusted effects demonstrated a significant association of type D personality and hard endpoints (odds ratio (OR) of 2.28 (95% CI [1.43-3.62]), adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 2.24 (95% CI [1.37-3.66])). The OR decreased over time (OR 5.02 to OR 1.54). There was no association in congestive heart failure patients. CONCLUSIONS: More recent methodologically sound studies suggest that early type D studies had overestimated the prognostic relevance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12160-011-9339-0

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific emotional experiences have distinct neurobiological and behavioral features and uniquely contribute to CVD risk.

    “However, specific emotional experiences have distinct neurobiological and behavioral features, and they uniquely contribute to CVD risk. 10-13”

    From Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says distinguishing specific negative emotions may help explain mechanisms linking emotions to cardiac disease. It does not establish distinct neurobiological or behavioral features, and it cautions that overlapping constructs make it difficult to determine whether specific emotions independently contribute to coronary artery disease risk. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Denollet J, Sys SU, Brutsaert DL. Personality and mortality after myocardial infarction. Psychosom Med. 1995; 57: 582-591.
  2. Denollet J. DS14: Standard assessment of negative affectivity, social inhibition, and type D personality. Psychosom Med. 2005; 67: 89-97.
  3. Pedersen SS, Denollet J. Type D personality, cardiac events, and impaired quality of life: A review. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2003; 10: 241-248.
  4. Reich J, Schatzberg A. Personality traits and medical outcome of cardiac illness. J Psychiatr Res. 2010; 44: 1017-1020.
  5. O'Dell KR, Masters KS, Spielmans GI, Maisto SA. Does type-D personality predict outcomes among patients with cardiovascular disease? A meta-analytic review. J Psychosom Res. 2011; 71: 199- 206.
  6. Denollet J, Brutsaert DL. Personality, disease severity, and the risk of long-term cardiac events in patients with a decreased ejection fraction after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998; 97: 167- 173.
  7. Pedersen SS, Denollet J, Ong ATL et al. Adverse clinical events in patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents: The impact of type D personality. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007; 14: 135-140.
  8. Denollet J, Sys SU, Stroobant N, Rombouts H, Gillebert TC, Brutsaert DL. Personality as independent predictor of long-term mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1996; 347: 417-421.
  9. Pedersen SS, Lemos PA, van Vooren PR et al. Type D personality predicts death or myocardial infarction after bare metal stent or sirolimus-eluting stent implantation-A Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44: 997-1001.
  10. Coyne JC, Jaarsma T, Luttik ML, van Sonderen E, van Veldhuisen DJ, Sanderman R. Lack of prognostic value of type D personality for mortality in a large sample of heart failure patients. Psychosom Med. 2011; 73: 557-562.
  11. Grande G, Romppel M, Vesper J-M, Schubmann R, Glaesmer H, Herrmann-Lingen C. Type-D personality and all-cause mortality in cardiac patients: Data from a German cohort study. Psychosom Med. 2011; 73: 548-556.
  12. Pelle AJ, Pedersen SS, Schiffer AA, Szabo B, Widdershoven JW, Denollet J. Psychological distress and mortality in systolic heart failure. Circ Heart Fail. 2010; 3: 261-267.
  13. Sterne JAC. Meta-analysis in Stata: An updated collection from the Stata journal. College Station, TX: Stata; 2009.
  14. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Con- trolled Clinical Trials. 1986; 7: 177-188.
  15. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327: 557-560.
  16. Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997; 315: 629-634.
  17. van der Vlugt MJ, Van Domburg RT, Pedersen SS et al. Feelings of being disabled as a risk factor for mortality up to 8 years after acute myocardial infarction. J Psychosom Res. 2005; 59: 247-253.
  18. Van Domburg RT, Pedersen SS, van den Brand MJBM, Erdman RAM. Feelings of being disabled as a predictor of mortality in men 10 years after percutaneous coronary transluminal angioplasty. J Psychosom Res. 2001; 51: 469-477.
  19. Denollet J, Martens EJ, Nyklicek I, Conraads VM, de Gelder B. Clinical events in coronary patients who report low distress: Ad- verse effect of repressive coping. Health Psychol. 2008; 27: 302- 308.
  20. Pedersen S, Denollet J, Ong A et al. Increased risk of mortality or myocardial infarction 2 years post-PCI in type D patients treated with sirolimus-eluting stents. Psychol Health. 2005; 20: 206-207.
  21. Denollet J, Vaes J, Brutsaert DL. Inadequate response to treatment in coronary heart disease-Adverse effects of type D personality and younger age on 5-year prognosis and quality of life. Circula- tion. 2000; 102: 630-635.
  22. Denollet J, Pedersen SS, Vrints CJ, Conraads VM. Usefulness of type D personality in predicting five-year cardiac events above and beyond concurrent symptoms of stress in patients with coronary heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 97: 970-973.
  23. Denollet J, Pedersen SS, Ong ATL, Erdman RAM, Serruys PW, Van Domburg RT. Social inhibition modulates the effect of nega- tive emotions on cardiac prognosis following percutaneous coro- nary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 171-177.
  24. Denollet J, Holmes RVF, Vrints CJ, Conraads VM. Unfavorable outcome of heart transplantation in recipients with type D person- ality. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007; 26: 152-158.
  25. Denollet J, Pedersen SS. Prognostic value of type D personality compared with depressive symptoms. Arch Intern Med. 2008; 168: 431-432.
  26. Aquarius AE, Smolderen KG, Hamming JF, De Vries J, Vriens PW, Denollet J. Type D personality and mortality in peripheral arterial disease: A pilot study. Arch Surg. 2009; 144: 728-733.
  27. Martens EJ, Mols F, Burg MM, Denollet J. Type D personality predicts clinical events after myocardial infarction, above and beyond disease severity and depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010; 71: 778-783.
  28. Pedersen SS, van den Broek KC, Erdman RA, Jordaens L, Theuns DA. Pre-implantation implantable cardioverter defibrillator con- cerns and type D personality increase the risk of mortality in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator. Europace. 2010; 12: 1446-1452.
  29. Volz A, Schmid JP, Zwahlen M, Kohls S, Saner H, Barth J. Predictors of readmission and health related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure: A comparison of different psychosocial aspects. J Behav Med. 2011; 34: 13-22.
  30. Erdman RA, Duivenvoorden HJ, Verhage F. Predictability of ben- eficial effects in cardiac rehabilitation: A randomized clinical trial of psychosocial variables. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1986; 6: 206-213.
  31. Barth J, Schumacher M, Herrmann-Lingen C. Depression as a risk factor for mortality in patients with coronary heart disease: A meta- analysis. Psychosom Med. 2004; 66: 802-813.
  32. Nicholson A, Kuper H, Hemingway H. Depression as an aetiologic and prognostic factor in coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis of 6362 events among 146538 participants in 54 observational stud- ies. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 2763-2774.
  33. Roest AM, Martens EJ, de Jonge P, Denollet J. Anxiety and risk of incident coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 56: 38-46.
  34. van Melle JP, de Jonge P, Spijkerman TA et al. Prognostic associ- ation of depression following myocardial infarction with mortality and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis. Psychosom Med. 2004; 66: 814-822.
  35. Smith TW. Toward a more systematic, cumulative, and applicable science of personality and health: Lessons from type D personality. Psychosom Med. 2011; 73: 528-532.
  36. Watson D, Clark LA. Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychol Bull. 1984; 96: 465-490.
  37. Watson D, Tellegen A. Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychol Bull. 1985; 98: 219-235.
  38. Rutledge T, Reis VA, Linke SE, Greenberg BH, Mills PJ. Depres- sion in heart failure: a meta-analytic review of prevalence, inter- vention effects, and associations with clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006; 48: 1527-1537.
  39. Grande G, Romppel M, Glaesmer H, Petrowski K, Herrmann- Lingen C. The type-D scale (DS14)-Norms and prevalence of type-D personality in a population-based representative sample in Germany. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010; 48: 935- 939.
  40. Booth-Kewley S, Friedman HS. Psychological predictors of heart disease: A quantitative review. Psychol Bull. 1987; 101: 343-362.
  41. Matthews KA. Coronary heart disease and type A behaviors: Update on and alternative to the Booth-Kewley and Friedman (1987) quantitative review. Psychol Bull. 1988; 104: 373-380.
  42. Hemingway H, Marmot M. Evidence based cardiology: Psycho- social factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease. Systematic review of prospective cohort studies. BMJ. 1999; 318: 1460-1467.
  43. Myrtek M. Meta-analyses of prospective studies on coronary heart disease, type A personality, and hostility. Int J Cardiol. 2001; 79: 245-251.
  44. Ioannidis JP, Panagiotou OA. Comparison of effect sizes associated with biomarkers reported in highly cited individual articles and in subsequent meta-analyses. JAMA. 2011; 305: 2200-2210.
  45. Smith TW, MacKenzie J. Personality and risk of physical illness. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2006; 2: 435-467.
  46. Grande G, Glaesmer H, Roth M. The construct validity of social inhibition and the type-D taxonomy. J Health Psychol. 2010; 15: 1103-1112.
  47. Maxwell SE, Delaney HD. Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. Psychol Bull. 1993; 113: 181-190.
  48. Vargha A, Rudas T, Delaney HD, Maxwell SE. Dichotomization, partial correlation, and conditional independence. J Educ Behav Stat. 1996; 21: 264-282.
  49. Ferguson E, Williams L, O'Connor RC et al. A taxometric analysis of type-D personality. Psychosom Med. 2009; 71: 981-986.
  50. Freedland KE, Reese RL, Steinmeyer BC. Multivariable models in biobehavioral research. Psychosom Med. 2009; 71: 205-216.
  51. Young SS, Karr A. Deming, data and observational studies. A process out of control and needing fixing. Significance. 2011; 8: 116-120.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grande, G., Romppel, M., & Barth, J.
Affiliations
  • Leipzig University of Applied Sciences (DE)
  • University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Grande, Gesine
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2012-01-12
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
299-310
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2094064862
Cited by
230
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
Type D personality, cardiovascular disease, prognosis, mortality, hard endpoints, congestive heart failure, personality and health, moderator analysis
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Depression, Humans, Personality, Prognosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review