CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 39

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

PortionControl@HOME: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effect of a Multi‐Component Portion Size Intervention on Portion Control Behavior and Body Mass Index

Poelman, Maartje P., de Vet, Emely, Velema, Elizabeth, de Boer, Michiel R., Seidell, Jacob C., Steenhuis, Ingrid H. M.·2015·Annals of Behavioral Medicine
DOI 10.1007/s12160-014-9637-4PMC PMC4335123
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12160-014-9637-4

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Randomized clinical trials evaluating culinary medicine interventions on adults with cardiometabolic risk factors found short-term improvement in weight.

    “Randomized clinical trials (RCT) evaluating the impact of CM interventions on adults with cardiometabolic risk factors found short‐term improvement in vegetable intake [18], Mediterranean diet score [19], and weight [20, 21].”

    From One‐Year Weight Loss Following a Remote Culinary Medicine Program: A Bi‐Center Randomized Controlled Trial (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Methods describe a randomized portion-control intervention that included a cooking class and enrolled adults with BMI above 25 kg/m². The Results (Body Mass Index) show a short-term decrease in BMI, but the three-month difference from controls was statistically significant only after three outliers were excluded. The claim’s unqualified statement that the intervention improved weight overstates that finding. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. Bray GA, Bouchard C Handbook of obesity; clinical applications, Vol. 2, 4th edition. Taylor & Francis Group; 2014. · DOI
  2. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Kral TV, Meengs JS, Wall DE. Increasing the portion size of a packaged snack increases energy intake in men and women. Appetite. 2004; 42(1): 63-69. · DOI
  3. Rolls BJ, Morris EL, Roe LS. Portion size of food affects energy intake in normal-weight and overweight men and women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002; 76(6): 1207-1213. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Wansink B, Park SB. At the movies: How external cues and perceived taste impact consumption volume. Food Qual Prefer. 2001; 12(1): 69-74. · DOI
  5. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS. The effect of large portion sizes on energy intake is sustained for 11 days. Obesity. 2007; 15(6): 1535-1543. · DOI
  6. Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS. Larger portion sizes lead to a sustained increase in energy intake over 2 days. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106(4): 543-549. · DOI
  7. Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977-1998. JAMA. 2003 22-29;289(4):450-3. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Young LR, Nestle M. The contribution of expanding portion sizes to the US obesity epidemic. Am J Public Health. 2002; 92(2): 246-249. · DOI
  9. Steenhuis IHM, Leeuwis FH, Vermeer WM. Small, medium, large or supersize: Trends in food portion sizes in The Netherlands. Public Health Nutr. 2010; 13(6): 852-857. · DOI
  10. Ledikwe JH, Ello-Martin JA, Rolls BJ. Portion sizes and the obesity epidemic. J Nutr. 2005; 135(4): 905-909. · DOI
  11. Jeffery RW, Rydell S, Dunn CL, et al. Effects of portion size on chronic energy intake. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007; 4: 27. · DOI
  12. Steenhuis IHM, Vermeer WM. Portion size: Review and framework for interventions. Int J Behav Nutr Phys. 2009; 6: 58. · DOI
  13. Vermeer WM, Steenhuis IHM, Leeuwis FH, Heymans MW, Seidell JC. Small portion sizes in worksite cafeterias: Do they help consumers to reduce their food intake? Int J Obes. 2011; 35(9): 1200-1207. · DOI
  14. Vermeer WM, Steenhuis IHM, Leeuwis FH, Bos AER, de Boer M, Seidell JC. View the label before you view the movie: A field experiment into the impact of Portion size and Guideline Daily Amounts labelling on soft drinks in cinemas. BMC Public Health. 2011; 6: 11.
  15. Vermeer WM, Steenhuis IHM, Leeuwis FH, Bos AER, de Boer M, Seidell JC. Portion size labeling and intended soft drink consumption: The impact of labeling format and size portfolio. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2010; 42(6): 422-426. · DOI
  16. Vermeer WM, Alting E, Steenhuis IHM, Seidell JC. Value for money or making the healthy choice: The impact of proportional pricing on consumers’ portion size choices. Eur J Public Health. 2010; 20(1): 65-69. · DOI
  17. Ueland O, Cardello AV, Merrill EP, Lesher LL. Effect of portion size information on food intake. J Am Diet Assoc. 2009; 109(1): 124-127. · DOI
  18. Lieux EM, Manning CK. Evening meals selected by college-students—Impact of the foodservice system. J Am Diet Assoc. 1992; 92(5): 560-566. · DOI
  19. Harnack LJ, French SA, Oakes JM, Story MT, Jeffery RW, Rydell SA. Effects of calorie labeling and value size pricing on fast food meal choices: Results from an experimental trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys. 2008; 5: 5. · DOI
  20. Antonuk B, Block LG. The effect of single serving versus entire package nutritional information on consumption norms and actual consumption of a snack food. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006; 38(6): 365-370. · DOI
  21. Riley WT, Beasley J, Sowell A, Behar A. Effects of a Web-based food portion training program on food portion estimation. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007; 39(2): 70-76. · DOI
  22. Poelman MP, Steenhuis IH, de Vet E, Seidell JC. The development and evaluation of an Internet-based intervention to increase awareness about food portion sizes: a randomized controlled trial. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013; 45(6): 701-707. · DOI
  23. Byrd-Bredbenner C, Schwartz J. The effect of practical portion size measurement aids on the accuracy of portion young adults. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2004; 17(4): 351-357. · DOI
  24. Brown LB, Oler CHK. A food display assignment and handling food models improves accuracy of college students’ estimates of food portions. J Am Diet Assoc. 2000; 100(9): 1063-1065. · DOI
  25. Ayala GX. An experimental evaluation of a group- versus computer-based intervention to improve food portion size estimation skills. Health Educ Res. 2006; 21(1): 133-145. · DOI
  26. Schwartz J, Byrd-Bredbenner C. Portion distortion: Typical portion sizes selected by young adults. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106(9): 1412-1418. · DOI
  27. Verplanken B, Wood W. Interventions to break and create consumer habits. J Public Policy Mark. 2006; 25(1): 90-103. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Poelman MP, de Vet E, Velema E, Seidell JC, Steenhuis IH. Behavioural strategies to control the amount of food selected and consumed. Appetite. 2014; 72: 156-165. · DOI
  29. De Ridder D, de Wit J. Self-regulation in health behavior. Sussex: Wiley; 2006. · DOI
  30. Swinburn B, Egger G, Raza F. Dissecting obesogenic environments: The development and application of a framework for identifying and prioritizing environmental interventions for obesity. Prev Med. 1999; 29(6 Pt 1): 563-570. · DOI
  31. Lin BH, Guthrie, J. & Frazao, E. (1999) Nutrient contribution of food away from home. In: America’s Eating Habits: Changes and Consequences (Frazao, E., ed.), pp. 213-242. AIB No. 750, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D.C
  32. Wansink B. Environmental factors that increase the food intake and consumption volume of unknowing consumers. Annu Rev Nutr. 2004; 24: 455-479. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Rosenkranz RR, Drewaltowski DA. Model of the home food environment pertaining to childhood obesity. Nutr Rev. 2008; 66(3): 123-140. · DOI
  34. Wansink B. Nutritional gatekeepers and the 72 % solution. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106(9): 1324-1326. · DOI
  35. Baron RM, Kenny DA. The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological-research—Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51(6): 1173-1182. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Sobel ME. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Washington DC: In S. Leinhardt (Ed.); 1982. · DOI · Paper page
  37. Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R, Scholz U, Schuz B. Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: Theory and assessment. Eur J Soc Psychol. 2005; 35(4): 565-576. · DOI
  38. Kroese FM, Adriaanse MA, De Ridder DTD. Boosters, anyone? Exploring the added value of booster sessions in a self-management intervention. Health Educ Res. 2012; 27(5): 825-833. · DOI
  39. Vinkers CD, Adriaanse MA, Kroese FM, de Ridder DT. Efficacy of a self-management intervention for weight control in overweight and obese adults: a randomized controlled trial. J Behav Med. 2013. doi: 10.1007/s10865-013-9530-9 . · DOI
  40. Perri MG, Nezu AM, McKelvey WF, et al. Relapse prevention training and problem-solving therapy in the long-term management of obesity. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2001; 69: 722-726. · DOI
  41. de Vet E, de Wit JB, Luszczynska A, et al. Access to excess: How do adolescents deal with unhealthy foods in their environment? Eur J Public Health. 2013; 23(5): 752-756. · DOI
  42. Thomas SL, Lewis S, Hyde J, Castle D, Komesaroff P. The solution needs to be complex. Obese adults’ attitudes about the effectiveness of individual and population based interventions for obesity. BMC Public Health. 2010; 15: 10.
  43. Molenberghs G, Kenward M. Missing data in clinical studies. West Sussex: Wiley; 2007. · DOI
  44. Merrill RM, Richardson JS. Validity of self-reported height, weight, and body mass index: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2006. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009; 6: A121.
  45. Relton C, Torgerson D, O'Cathain A, Nicholl J. Rethinking pragmatic randomised controlled trials: Introducing the “cohort multiple randomised controlled trial” design. BMJ. 2010; 340: 1066. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Poelman, M. P., de Vet, E., Velema, E., de Boer, M. R., Seidell, J. C., & Steenhuis, I. H. M.
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2014-08-21
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
18-28
ISSN
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
DOI
10.1007/s12160-014-9637-4
PMC
PMC4335123
Cited by
39
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review