Cited by 11Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingMathematical Biology Tumor Growth

Pre-existing Cell States Control Heterogeneity of Both EGFR and CXCR4 Signaling

Open access
Spinosa, Phillip C., Kinnunen, Patrick C., Humphries, Brock A., Luker, Gary D., Luker, Kathryn E., Linderman, Jennifer J.·2021·Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering

Abstract

Introduction CXCR4 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) represent two major families of receptors, G-protein coupled receptors and receptor tyrosine kinases, with central functions in cancer. While utilizing different upstream signaling molecules, both CXCR4 and EGFR activate kinases ERK and Akt, although single-cell activation of these kinases is markedly heterogeneous. One hypothesis regarding the origin of signaling heterogeneity proposes that intercellular variations arise from differences in pre-existing intracellular states set by extrinsic noise. While pre-existing cell states vary among cells, each pre-existing state defines deterministic signaling outputs to downstream effectors. Understanding causes of signaling heterogeneity will inform treatment of cancers with drugs targeting drivers of oncogenic signaling. Methods We built a single-cell computational model to predict Akt and ERK responses to CXCR4- and EGFR-mediated stimulation. We investigated signaling heterogeneity through these receptors and tested model predictions using quantitative, live-cell time-lapse imaging. Results We show that the pre-existing cell state predicts single-cell signaling through both CXCR4 and EGFR. Computational modeling reveals that the same set of pre-existing cell states explains signaling heterogeneity through both EGFR and CXCR4 at multiple doses of ligands and in two different breast cancer cell lines. The model also predicts how phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) targeted therapies potentiate ERK signaling in certain breast cancer cells and that low level, combined inhibition of MEK and PI3K ablates potentiated ERK signaling. Conclusions Our data demonstrate that a conserved motif exists for EGFR and CXCR4 signaling and suggest potential clinical utility of the computational model to optimize therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12195-020-00640-1

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At higher cell densities, more rigorous models such as Maxwell-Stefan diffusion would be more appropriate.

    “In this work, we considered a polynomial cell concentration dependence in the diffusivity for modeling nonlinear diffusion, but at higher cell densities, more rigorous models, such as Maxwell-Stefan diffusion would be more appropriate33.”

    From Inference of weak-form partial differential equations describing migration and proliferation mechanisms in wound healing experiments on cancer cells (2025) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Materials and Methods describe an ordinary-differential-equation model of EGFR and CXCR4 signaling, not a cell-concentration-dependent diffusion model. Searches for Maxwell–Stefan diffusion and polynomial diffusivity found no passage addressing whether a different diffusion model is appropriate at higher cell densities. The passages provide section labels but no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spinosa, P. C., Kinnunen, P. C., Humphries, B. A., Luker, G. D., Luker, K. E., & Linderman, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
  • Luker, Kathryn E.
  • Linderman, Jennifer J.
Venue
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
Published
2020-07-27
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
49-64
ISSN
  • 1865-5025 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-5033
OpenAlex
W3045883177
Cited by
10
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01CA196018, R01CA238042, R01CA238023, R33CA225549, R37CA222563, R50CA221807, U01CA210152)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (T32 EB005582)
  • American Cancer Society (PF-18-236-01-CCG)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Keywords
EGFR signaling, CXCR4 signaling, ERK activation, Akt activation, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, MEK inhibition, breast cancer, G protein-coupled receptors, receptor tyrosine kinase, cancer therapy optimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review