Cited by 80Afro-Latin American StudiesIndigenous Cultures and HistoryIndigenous Studies in Latin America

Black frontiersmen;: a south American case

Cottrol, Robert J., Whitten, Norman E.·1976·Contemporary Sociology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2063382

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cottrol, R. J., & Whitten, N. E.
Venue
Contemporary Sociology
Published
1976-09
Volume
5
Issue
5
Pages
659
ISSN
0094-3061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2037213497
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Afro-Latin American Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Indigenous Studies in Latin America
Keywords
African Americans, South America, racial identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review