Cited by 173Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Disrupted structural and functional brain connectomes in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease

Open access
Dai, Zhengjia, He, Yong·2014·Neuroscience Bulletin

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia, comprising an estimated 60-80% of all dementia cases. It is clinically characterized by impairments of memory and other cognitive functions. Previous studies have demonstrated that these impairments are associated with abnormal structural and functional connections among brain regions, leading to a disconnection concept of AD. With the advent of a combination of non-invasive neuroimaging (structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion MRI, and functional MRI) and neurophysiological techniques (electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography) with graph theoretical analysis, recent studies have shown that patients with AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), the prodromal stage of AD, exhibit disrupted topological organization in large-scale brain networks (i.e., connectomics) and that this disruption is significantly correlated with the decline of cognitive functions. In this review, we summarize the recent progress of brain connectomics in AD and MCI, focusing on the changes in the topological organization of large-scale structural and functional brain networks using graph theoretical approaches. Based on the two different perspectives of information segregation and integration, the literature reviewed here suggests that AD and MCI are associated with disrupted segregation and integration in brain networks. Thus, these connectomics studies open up a new window for understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms of AD and demonstrate the potential to uncover imaging biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and treatment evaluation for this disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12264-013-1421-0

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inconsistencies in connectome findings are a well-known issue in the literature and often reflect differences in methodology such as imaging modality and/or choice of thresholding method.

    “Inconsistencies in connectome findings are a well-known issue in the literature (for reviews, see Dai & He, 2014; Tijms, Wink et al., 2013) and often reflect differences in methodology such as imaging modality and/or choice of thresholding method.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. Fagan AM, et al. Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2011, 7: 280-292.
  2. Delbeuck X, Van der Linden M, Collette F. Alzheimer's [6] disease as a disconnection syndrome? Neuropsychol Rev 2003, 13: 79-92.
  3. Delbeuck X, Collette F, Van der Linden M. Is Alzheimer's [7] disease a disconnection syndrome? Neuropsychologia 2007, 45: 3315-3323.
  4. Bozzali M, Parker GJM, Serra L, Embleton K, Gili T, Perri R [8] , et al. Anatomical connectivity mapping: A new tool to assess brain disconnection in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 2011, 54: 2045-2051.
  5. Bullmore E, Sporns O. Complex brain networks: graph [9] theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009, 10: 186-198.
  6. Bullmore E, Sporns O. The economy of brain network [10] organization. Nat Rev Neurosci 2012, 13: 336-349.
  7. MP. Characterizing variation in the functional connectome: promise and pitfalls. Trends Cogn Sci 2012, 16: 181-188.
  8. Boccaletti S, Latora V, Moreno Y, Chavez M, Hwang D. [12] Complex networks: Structure and dynamics. Physics Rep 2006, 424: 175-308.
  9. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain [13] connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 2010, 52: 1059-1069.
  10. networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103: 8577-8582.
  11. clarifi cation. Soc Networks 1979, 1: 215-239.
  12. scores and clique identifi cation. J Math Sociol 1972, 2: 113- 120.
  13. Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' [18] networks. Nature 1998, 393: 440-442.
  14. He Y, Chen Z, Gong G, Evans A. Neuronal networks in [19] Alzheimer's disease. Neuroscientist 2009, 15: 333-350.
  15. connectomics. Front Psychiatry 2011, 2: 77.
  16. in the human brain revealed by cortical thickness from MRI. Cereb Cortex 2007, 17: 2407-2419.
  17. Weinberger DR, Meyer-Lindenberg A. Hierarchical organization of human cortical networks in health and schizophrenia. J Neurosci 2008, 28: 9239-9248.
  18. Brammer MJ, et al. Supra-regional Brain Systems and the Neuropathology of Schizophrenia. Cereb Cortex 1999, 9: 366-378.
  19. Munoz KE, Kolachana BS, et al. 5-HTTLPR polymorphism impacts human cingulate-amygdala interactions: a genetic susceptibility mechanism for depression. Nat Neurosci 2005, 8: 828-834.
  20. He Y, Chen Z, Evans A. Structural insights into aberrant [26] topological patterns of large-scale cortical networks in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 2008, 28: 4756-4766.
  21. Yao Z, Zhang Y, Lin L, Zhou Y, Xu C, Jiang T. Abnormal [27] cortical networks in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6: e1001006.
  22. Le Bihan D. Looking into the functional architecture of the [29] brain with diffusion MRI. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003, 4: 469-480.
  23. Mori S, van Zijl PC. Fiber tracking: principles and strategies - [30] a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002, 15: 468-480.
  24. VJ, Meuli R, et al. Mapping human whole-brain structural networks with diffusion MRI. PLoS One 2007, 2: e597.
  25. Gong G, He Y, Concha L, Lebel C, Gross DW, Evans AC [32, et al. Mapping anatomical connectivity patterns of human cerebral cortex using in vivo diffusion tensor imaging tractography. Cereb Cortex 2009, 19: 524-536.
  26. Gomez Y, Melie-Garcia L. Studying the human brain anatomical network via diffusion-weighted MRI and Graph Theory. Neuroimage 2008, 40: 1064-1076.
  27. Diffusion tensor tractography reveals abnormal topological organization in structural cortical networks in Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci 2010, 30: 16876-16885.
  28. Koek HL, Biessels GJ. Disruption of cerebral networks and cognitive impairment in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 2013, 80: 1370-1377.
  29. Shu N, Liang Y, Li H, Zhang J, Li X, Wang L [36] , et al. Disrupted topological organization in white matter structural networks in amnestic mild cognitive impairment: relationship to subtype. Radiology 2012, 265: 518-527.
  30. Bai F, Shu N, Yuan Y, Shi Y, Yu H, Wu D [38] , et al. Topologically Convergent and Divergent Structural Connectivity Patterns between Patients with Remitted Geriatric Depression and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Neurosci 2012, 32: 4307-4318.
  31. Stam CJ. Functional connectivity patterns of human [39] magnetoencephalographic recordings: a 'small-world' network? Neurosci Lett 2004, 355: 25-28.
  32. Boomsma DI, Hulshoff Pol HE, et al. The brain matures with stronger functional connectivity and decreased randomness of its network. PLoS One 2012, 7: e36896.
  33. Stam CJ, Jones BF, Nolte G, Breakspear M, Scheltens [42P. Small-world networks and functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. Cereb Cortex 2007, 17: 92-99.
  34. Manshanden I, van Cappellen van Walsum AM, et al. Graph theoretical analysis of magnetoencephalographic functional connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. Brain 2009, 132: 213- 224.
  35. de Haan W, Pijnenburg YA, Strijers RL, van der Made Y, van [44der Flier WM, Scheltens P, et al. Functional neural network analysis in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease using EEG and graph theory. BMC Neurosci 2009, 10: 101.
  36. de Haan W, van der Flier WM, Koene T, Smits LL, Scheltens P, [45] Stam CJ. Disrupted modular brain dynamics refl ect cognitive dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 2012, 59: 3085-3093.
  37. Scheltens P, Stam C. Disruption of functional brain networks in Alzheimer's disease: what can we learn from graph spectral analysis of resting-state MEG? Brain Connect 2012, 2: 45-55.
  38. Buldu JM, Bajo R, Maestu F, Castellanos N, Leyva I, Gil P [47] , et al. Reorganization of functional networks in mild cognitive impairment. PLoS One 2011, 6: e19584.
  39. D, Bullmore E. Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. Cereb Cortex 2005, 15: 1332-1342.
  40. Achard S, Salvador R, Whitcher B, Suckling J, Bullmore E. A [50] resilient, low-frequency, small-world human brain functional network with highly connected association cortical hubs. J Neurosci 2006, 26: 63-72.
  41. Supekar K, Menon V, Rubin D, Musen M, Greicius MD. [51Network analysis of intrinsic functional brain connectivity in Alzheimer's disease. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4: e1000100.
  42. Rombouts SA, Maris E, Barkhof F, et al. Loss of 'small-world' networks in Alzheimer's disease: graph analysis of FMRI resting-state functional connectivity. PLoS One 2010, 5: e13788.
  43. Modular reorganization of brain resting state networks and its independent validation in Alzheimer's disease patients. Front Hum Neurosci 2013, 7: 456.
  44. Li Y, Qin Y, Chen X, Li W. Exploring the functional brain [55] network of Alzheimer's disease: based on the computational experiment. PLoS One 2013, 8: e73186.
  45. Wang J, Zuo X, Dai Z, Xia M, Zhao Z, Zhao X [56] , et al. Disrupted Functional Brain Connectome in Individuals at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease. Biol Psychiatry 2012, 73: 472-481.
  46. T, Sullivan C, et al. Neuronal dysfunction and disconnection of cortical hubs in non-demented subjects with elevated amyloid burden. Brain 2011, 134: 1635-1646.
  47. Bai L, Zhang M, Chen S, Ai L, Xu M, Wang D [58] , et al. Characterizing acupuncture de qi in mild cognitive impairment: relations with small-world effi ciency of functional brain networks. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013, 2013: 1-7.
  48. Liu Z, Zhang Y, Yan H, Bai L, Dai R, Wei W [59] , et al. Altered topological patterns of brain networks in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: A resting-state fMRI study. Psychiatry Res 2012, 202: 118-125.
  49. Liu Y, Yu C, Zhang X, Liu J, Duan Y, Alexander-Bloch AF [60] , et al. Impaired long distance functional connectivity and weighted network architecture in Alzheimer's disease. Cereb Cortex 2013. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs410 · DOI
  50. Sporns O, Tononi G, Kotter R. The human connectome: A [62] structural description of the human brain. PLoS Comput Biol 2005, 1: e42.
  51. Wang J, Wang L, Zang Y, Yang H, Tang H, Gong Q [63] , et al. Parcellation-dependent small-world brain functional networks: a resting-state fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 2009, 30: 1511- 1523.
  52. de Reus MA, van den Heuvel MP. The parcellation-based [64] connectome: limitations and extensions. Neuroimage 2013, 80: 397-404.
  53. Liang X, Wang J, Yan C, Shu N, Xu K, Gong G [65] , et al. Effects of different correlation metrics and preprocessing factors on small-world brain functional networks: a resting-state functional MRI study. PLoS One 2012, 7: e32766.
  54. SW, Buckner RL. Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. J Neurophysiol 2010, 103: 297-321.
  55. functional MR imaging duration on stability of graph theory metrics of brain network connectivity. Radiology 2011, 259: 516-524.
  56. Bassett DS, Brown JA, Deshpande V, Carlson JM, Grafton [68ST. Conserved and variable architecture of human white matter connectivity. Neuroimage 2011, 54: 1262-1279.
  57. Alahuhta S, Reiss AL, et al. Persistent default-mode network connectivity during light sedation. Hum Brain Mapp 2008, 29: 839-847.
  58. Cao H, Plichta MM, Schafer A, Haddad L, Grimm O, [70] Schneider M, et al. Test-retest reliability of fMRI-based graph theoretical properties during working memory, emotion processing, and resting state. Neuroimage 2014, 84: 888- 900.
  59. Reproducibility of functional network metrics and network structure: a comparison of task-related BOLD, resting ASL with BOLD contrast, and resting cerebral blood flow. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2013, 13: 627-640.
  60. Bastin ME. Test-retest reliability of structural brain networks from diffusion MRI. Neuroimage 2014, 86: 231-243.
  61. Liao XH, Xia MR, Xu T, Dai ZJ, Cao XY, Niu HJ [73] , et al. Functional brain hubs and their test-retest reliability: a multiband resting-state functional MRI study. Neuroimage 2013, 83: 969-982.
  62. Hummer TA, et al. Characteristics and variability of structural networks derived from diffusion tensor imaging. Neuroimage 2012, 64: 1153-1164.
  63. Leoni V. The effect of apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype [76] on biomarkers of amyloidogenesis, tau pathology and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011, 49: 375-383.
  64. Brown JA, Terashima KH, Burggren AC, Ercoli LM, Miller KJ, [77Small GW, et al. Brain network local interconnectivity loss in aging APOE-4 allele carriers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011, 108: 20760-20765.
  65. Hardy J, Selkoe DJ. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's [78] disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science 2002, 297: 353-356.
  66. beta-protein and the mechanism of Alzheimer's disease. Handb Clin Neurol 2008, 89: 245-260.
  67. de Haan W, Mott K, van Straaten EC, Scheltens P, Stam CJ. [81Activity dependent degeneration explains hub vulnerability in Alzheimer's disease. PLoS Comput Biol 2012, 8: e1002582.
  68. Raj A, Kuceyeski A, Weiner M. A network diffusion model of [82] disease progression in dementia. Neuron 2012, 73: 1204- 1215.
  69. Predicting regional neurodegeneration from the healthy brain functional connectome. Neuron 2012, 73: 1216-1227.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dai, Z., & He, Y.
Affiliations
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Venue
Neuroscience Bulletin
Published
2014-04
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
217-232
ISSN
  • 1995-8218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1673-7067
OpenAlex
W2018593373
Cited by
173
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81225012, 2014CB846102, 31221003, 81030028)
  • National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (81225012)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, connectomics, structural connectome, functional connectome, large-scale brain networks, graph theory, network integration and segregation, disconnection hypothesis, imaging biomarkers, cognitive decline
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Neural Pathways, Cognitive Dysfunction, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review