Cited by 29Mental Health Treatment and AccessSchool Health and Nursing EducationSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Depression Education and Identification in Schools: An Australian-based Study

Open access
Robinson, Jo, Gook, Sara, Yuen, Hok Pan, Hughes, Alison, Dodd, Simon, Bapat, Swagata, Schwass, Wayne, McGorry, Patrick +1 more·2010·School Mental Health

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12310-009-9022-9

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, J., Gook, S., Yuen, H. P., Hughes, A., Dodd, S., Bapat, S., Schwass, W., McGorry, P., & Yung, A.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Robinson, Jo
Venue
School Mental Health
Published
2009-12-16
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
13-22
ISSN
  • 1866-2625 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-2633
OpenAlex
W2013277269
Cited by
29
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • School Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
adolescent depression, depression education, school-based intervention, help-seeking, stigma, mental health literacy, suicidal ideation, self-harm, at-risk students, high school boys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review