Cited by 67Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Does Screening High School Students for Psychological Distress, Deliberate Self-Harm, or Suicidal Ideation Cause Distress – And Is It Acceptable?: An Australian-Based Study

Robinson, Jo, Pan Yuen, Hok, Martin, Cathy, Hughes, Ally, Baksheev, Gennady N., Dodd, Simon, Bapat, Swagata, Schwass, Wayne +2 more·2011·Crisis

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Programs designed to detect students at risk of depression and suicidality have shown success (Shaffer et al., 2004). AIMS: The current study sought to examine whether or not such a program was acceptable to participants and whether or not it caused distress. METHODS: Participants were boys aged 14 to 16. Participants were assessed using an on-line questionnaire; acceptability was measured via postal questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 272 participants, 31 (11.4%) were considered at-risk; 13 required ongoing support, 8 of whom had not previously sought help. Overall screening did not appear to cause significant undue distress, although some differences were evident between at-risk and not at-risk students. All participants found the program acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: When conducted carefully, early detection programs can be an effective and acceptable method of identifying at-risk adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/0227-5910/a000087

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior studies of suicide-risk screening have primarily focused on high school students and adolescents who have received in-patient psychiatric care, leaving a gap in understanding effects on younger children and those without psychiatric chief complaints.

    “However, these studies have primarily focused on high school students11,14 and adolescents who have received in-patient psychiatric care,15 leaving a gap in our understanding of the effects of suicide-risk screening on younger children and those without psychiatric chief complaints.”
  • Research indicates that the measurement of suicidal behaviours in adolescents is acceptable and does not pose an iatrogenic risk.

    “Research indicates that the measurement of suicidal behaviours in adolescents is acceptable and does not pose an iatrogenic risk [32].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robinson, J., Pan Yuen, H., Martin, C., Hughes, A., Baksheev, G. N., Dodd, S., Bapat, S., Schwass, W., McGorry, P., & Yung, A. R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Orygen Youth Health Research Centre, Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
Venue
Crisis
Published
2011-09-01
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
254-263
ISSN
  • 0227-5910 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2396
OpenAlex
W2116077904
Cited by
67
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Crisis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
suicide risk screening, high school students, adolescent depression, suicidal ideation, self-harm, psychological distress, acceptability, early detection programs, at-risk youth, boys, help-seeking
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depression, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Stress, Psychological, Students, Victoria, Self-Injurious Behavior, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review