Cited by 77Cardiovascular Disease and AdiposityCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors

Epicardial adipose tissue volume and coronary artery calcium to predict myocardial ischemia on positron emission tomography-computed tomography studies

Janik, Matthew, Hartlage, Gregory, Alexopoulos, Nikolaos, Mirzoyev, Zaur, McLean, Dalton S., Arepalli, Chesnal D., Chen, Zhengjia, Stillman, Arthur E. +1 more·2010·Journal of Nuclear Cardiology

Abstract

Background There appears to be an association of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) with coronary artery disease (CAD) and its risk factors. EAT is assumed to influence CAD development by altering vasomotor tone and via toxic paracrine effects. The relationship of EAT to myocardial perfusion has not been studied.Methods Quantification of EAT and CAC was performed on positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) studies in 45 subjects (77% intermediate pre-test probability of CAD) with mild-moderate myocardial ischemia (5-14% perfusion defect, n = 23), severe ischemia (≥15% defect, n = 22) and a control group with no ischemia matched for CAD risk factors (n = 52).Results EAT volume showed a better correlation with myocardial ischemia than total CAC (r = .47 vs r = .28, P < .01). EAT volume increased significantly from the control group to subjects with mild-moderate and severe ischemia (96.9, 124.5, and 143.9 cm(3), P < .01 for both ischemia groups vs controls). Total mean CAC was significantly higher in the severe ischemia group (676.3) than in control group (229.4) (P < .01). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that EAT volume was, but CAC was not, a significant predictor of ischemia after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and each other. EAT volume was a better predictor of ischemia than total CAC [area under the curve (AUC): .764 vs .6291, P = .04]. The combination of EAT + CAC (AUC = .7694) did not improve over EAT volume alone (P = .57).Conclusions In this study, EAT volume assessed by CT was an independent predictor of ischemia on PET, and outperformed CAC score in a CAD naïve population at intermediate pre-test probability of disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12350-010-9235-1

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Janik, M., Hartlage, G., Alexopoulos, N., Mirzoyev, Z., McLean, D. S., Arepalli, C. D., Chen, Z., Stillman, A. E., & Raggi, P.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Raggi, Paolo
Venue
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
841-847
ISSN
1071-3581 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093766001
Cited by
77
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nuclear Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Keywords
epicardial adipose tissue, coronary artery calcium, myocardial ischemia, coronary artery disease, myocardial perfusion, PET/CT, EAT volume, ischemia prediction, coronary artery calcification
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adult, Aged, Calcium, Coronary Vessels, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pericardium, Risk Factors, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Myocardial Ischemia, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review