Cited by 46Social Robot Interaction and HRIAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Transitional Wearable Companions: A Novel Concept of Soft Interactive Social Robots to Improve Social Skills in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Open access
Özcan, Beste, Caligiore, Daniele, Sperati, Valerio, Moretta, Tania, Baldassarre, Gianluca·2016·International Journal of Social Robotics

Abstract

We present a novel concept of interactive devices, called “transitional wearable companions” (TWCs), usable to support therapy and foster social skill development in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). TWCs have two distinctive features. First, they are soft interactive devices, which look like tender animals, able to arise attachment emotions and give a continuous reassuring physical contact. Second, TWCs are embedded social robots responding to the child’s manipulations by emitting lights, sounds, or vibrations usable for multiple purposes, for example to enhance the child’s engagement. TWCs can have additional important features. First, the input–output rules with which they respond to the child’s actions can be changed by the therapist/caregiver, for example through a tablet, thus opening a large number of possibilities to foster social interaction. Second, TWCs can have biosensors gathering information on the child’s physiological and emotional state, thus offering multiple ways to support the interaction with the child during therapy and daily life. The paper presents the principles underlying TWC design, their possible future enhancements, a first prototype (+me) of social TWC, and possible empirical experiment procedures to test the effectiveness of TWC in controlled experiments. For their multifaceted and flexible features, TWCs might become an important tool to enhance ASD children’s social abilities in ecological and therapeutic contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12369-016-0373-8

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Özcan, B., Caligiore, D., Sperati, V., Moretta, T., & Baldassarre, G.
Affiliations
National Research Council (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Özcan, Beste
  • Caligiore, Daniele
  • Sperati, Valerio
  • Moretta, Tania
  • Baldassarre, Gianluca
Venue
International Journal of Social Robotics
Published
2016-07-25
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
471-481
ISSN
  • 1875-4791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-4805
OpenAlex
W2485033811
Cited by
46
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Social Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS eCampus Telematic University (Università degli Studi eCampus) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, children, social skills development, social therapy, attachment, biosensors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review