Cited by 99Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyLanguage and cultural evolutionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Investigating the role of food processing in human evolution: a niche construction approach

Wollstonecroft, Michèle M.·2011·Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12520-011-0062-3

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Processing techniques such as grinding, boiling, fermenting, and roasting were gradually adopted to enhance nutrient bioavailability from plant and animal foods, further increasing the amount of food extractable from a given area of land.

    “Processing techniques such as grinding, boiling, fermenting, and roasting were gradually adopted to enhance nutrient bioavailability from plant and animal foods, further increasing the amount of food extractable from a given area of land (59).”

    From Used planet: a global history (2013) · cites this paper as [59]

  • These processing techniques may have boosted nutritional returns on foraging efforts for small seeds and tubers to levels that made them worth exploiting at high levels for the first time, potentially setting them on course to later domestication.

    “These techniques may have boosted the nutritional returns on foraging efforts for small seeds and tubers to levels that made them worth exploiting at high levels for the first time (59), thereby potentially setting them on course to later domestication (60).”

    From Used planet: a global history (2013) · cites this paper as [59]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wollstonecroft, M. M.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Wollstonecroft, Michèle M.
Venue
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Published
2011-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
141-150
ISSN
  • 1866-9557 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-9565
OpenAlex
W2015588833
Cited by
99
References
70
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
16.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
British Academy
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
food processing, human evolution, niche construction theory, cultural niche construction, post-harvest processing, selection pressure, energy intake, diet breadth, food safety, brain evolution, locomotor adaptation, longevity, juvenile survival, disease prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review