Cited by 34Forensic Entomology and Diptera StudiesForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A taphonomic study of a carcass consumed by griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus) and its relevance for the interpretation of bone surface modifications

Domínguez-Solera, Santiago, Domínguez-Rodrigo, Manuel·2011·Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12520-011-0071-2

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Bello SM, Parfitt SA, Stringer CB (2009) Quantitative micromorphological analyses of cutmarks produced by ancient and modern handaxes. Journal of Archaeological Science 36:1869–1880 · DOI
  2. Binford LR (1981) Bones: ancient men, modern myths. Academic, New York
  3. Blumenschine RJ (1988) An experimental model of the timing of hominid and carnivore influence on archaeological bone assemblages. J Archaeol Sci 15:483–502 · DOI
  4. Blumenschine RJ, Selvaggio MM (1988) Percussion marks on bone surfaces as a new diagnostic of hominid behavior. Nature 333:763–765 · DOI
  5. Brain CK (1981) The hunters or the hunted? Chicago University Press, Chicago
  6. Bunn HT (1983) Evidence on the diet and subsistence patterns of Plio-Pleistocene hominids at Koobi Fora, Kenya, and at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. In: Clutton-Brock J, Grigson C (eds) Animals and archaeology: hunters and their prey. B.A.R. International Series, 163, pp. 21–30
  7. Cáceres Cuello de Oro I (2002) Tafonomía de yacimientos antrópicos en Karst. Complejo Galería (Sierra de Atapuerca, Burgos), Vanguard Cave (Gibraltar) y Abric Romaní (Capellades, Barcelona). Ph.D. dissertation, Universitat Rovira i Virgili
  8. de Juana S, Galan AB, Dominguez-Rodrigo M (2009) Taphonomic identification of cut marks made with lithic handaxes: an experimental study. Journal of Archaeological Science 37:1841–1850 · DOI
  9. Delaney-Rivera C, Plummer T, Hogson J, Forrest F, Hertel F, Oliver J (2009) Pits and pitfalls: taxonomic variability and patterning in tooth mark dimensions. J Archaeol Sci 36:2597–2608 · DOI
  10. Domínguez-Rodrigo M, Barba R (2006) New estimates of tooth marks and percussion marks from FLK Zinj, Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania): the carnivore-hominid-carnivore hypothesis falsified. J Hum Evol 50:170–194 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Domínguez-Rodrigo M, Piqueras A (2003) The use of tooth pits to identify carnivore taxa in toothmarked archaeofaunas and their relevance to reconstruct hominid carcass processing behaviours. J Archaeol Sci 30:1385–1391 · DOI
  12. Domínguez-Rodrigo M, Barba R, Egeland CP (2007) Deconstructing Olduvai. Springer, New York · DOI
  13. Domínguez-Rodrigo M, de Juana S, Galán A, Rodríguez M (2009) A new protocol to differentiate trampling marks from butchery cut marks. J Archaeol Sci 36:2643–2654 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Domínguez-Rodrigo M, Pickering TR, Bunn HT (2010) Configurational approach to identifying the earliest hominin butchers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:20929–20934 · DOI
  15. Domínguez-Solera S (2010) El buitre: agente tafonómico. Master's thesis. Department of Prehistory, Complutense University, Madrid
  16. Domínguez-Solera S, Domínguez-Rodrigo M (2009) A taphonomic study of bone modification and of tooth-mark patterns on long limb bone portions by suids. Int J Osteoarchaeol 19:345–363 · DOI
  17. Fisher JW (1995) Bone surface modification in zooarchaeology. J Archaeol Method Theory 1:7–65 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Greenfield HJ (1999) The origins of metallurgy: distinguishing stone from metal cut-marks on bones from archaeological sites. J Archaeol Sci 7:797–808 · DOI
  19. Iñigo A, del Moral JC (2009) Un pais de carroñeras. La Garcilla 139:6–8
  20. Jolee A, West JA, Louys J (2007) Differentiating bamboo from stone tool cut marks in the zooarchaeological record, with a discussion on the use of bamboo knives. J Archaeol Sci 4:512–518
  21. Khan S (2006) An assessment of avian and other scavenging of an animal carcass at Katerniaghat wildlife sanctuary, District Bahraich, Uttar Pradesh—India, and its forensic implications. Ph.D. dissertation, Bournemouth University, School of Conservation Sciences, UK
  22. Komar D, Beattie O (1998) Identifying bird scavenging in fleshed and dry remains. Can Soc Forensic Sci J 31(3):177–188 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lewis JE (2008) Identifying sword marks on bone: criteria for distinguishing between cut marks made by different classes of bladed weapons. J Archaeol Sci 7:2001–2008 · DOI
  24. Marín AB, Fosse P, Vigne JD (2009) Probable evidences of bone accumulation by Pleistocene bearded vulture at the archaeological site of El Mirón Cave (Spain). J Archaeol Sci 36:284–296 · DOI
  25. McPherron SP, Alemseged Z, Marean CW, Wynn JG, Reed D, Geraads D, Bobe R, Béarat HA (2010) Evidence for stone-tool-assisted consumption of animal tissues before 3.39 million years ago at Dikika, Ethiopia. Nature 466:857–860 · DOI
  26. Mundy P, Ledger JA (1976) Griffon vultures, carnivores and bones. S Afr J Sci 72:106–110
  27. Njau J, Blumenschine RJ (2006) A diagnosis of crocodile feeding traces on larger mammal bone, with fossil examples from the Plio-Pleistocene Olduvai Basin, Tanzania. J Hum Evol 50:142–162 · DOI
  28. Pickering RB, Bachman DC (2009) The use of forensic anthropology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, London, first 1997 · DOI
  29. Pickering TR, Egeland CP (2006) Experimental pattern of hammerstone percussion damage on bones: implications for inferences of carcass processing by humans. J Archaeol Sci 33:459–469 · DOI
  30. Plug I (1978) Collecting patterns of six species of vultures (Aves: Accipitridae). Ann Transvaal Museum 31:51–63
  31. Pobiner BL (2008) Paleoecological information from predator tooth marks. Journal of Taphonomy 6(3–4):373–397
  32. Potts R, Shipman P (1981) Cutmarks made by stone tools from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Nature 291:577–580 · DOI
  33. Reeves NM (2009) Taphonomic effects of vulture scavenging. J Forensic Sci 54:523–529 · DOI
  34. Robert I, Vigne JD (2002) The bearded vulture (Gypaetus barbatus) as an accumulator of archaeological bones. Late glacial assemblages and present-day reference data in Corsica (Western Mediterranean). J Archaeol Sci 29:763–777 · DOI
  35. Sánchez A (2007) New occurrences of the extinct vulture Gyps melitensis (Falconiformes, Aves) and a reappraisal of paleospecies. J Vertebr Paleontol 27:1057–1061 · DOI
  36. Tyrberg T (1998) Pleistocene birds of the paleoartic: a catalogue. Nuttal Ornithological Club, Cambridge

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Domínguez-Solera, S., & Domínguez-Rodrigo, M.
Affiliations
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Venue
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
Published
2011-06-30
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
385-392
ISSN
  • 1866-9557 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-9565
OpenAlex
W2141628540
Cited by
34
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
griffon vulture, Gyps fulvus, bone surface modification, taphonomy, biostratinomy, carcass consumption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review