Cited by 66Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsBehavioral Health and InterventionsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Self-Monitoring as a Mediator of Weight Loss in the SMART Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Turk, Melanie Warziski, Elci, Okan U., Wang, Jing, Sereika, Susan M., Ewing, Linda J., Acharya, Sushama D., Glanz, Karen, Burke, Lora E.·2013·International Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background Integral components of behavioral weight-loss treatment include self-monitoring of diet and physical activity along with feedback to participants regarding their behaviors. While providing feedback has been associated with weight loss, no studies have examined the impact of feedback frequency on weight loss or the mediating role of self-monitoring adherence in this relationship. Purpose This study examined the effect of participant feedback frequency on weight loss and determined if this effect was mediated by adherence to self-monitoring in a behavioral weight-loss trial conducted in the USA. Method Participants (N = 210) were randomly assigned to one of three self-monitoring methods with either no-daily feedback messages or daily feedback messages: (1) paper diary (PD), no-daily feedback; (2) personal digital assistant (PDA), no-daily feedback; and (3) PDA, daily tailored feedback messages (PDA + FB). The Sobel test via bootstrapping examined the direct effect of feedback frequency on weight loss and the indirect effect through self-monitoring adherence. Results Receiving daily feedback messages significantly increased participants' self-monitoring adherence. A significant effect of feedback frequency on weight loss was noted; however, after adjusting for self-monitoring adherence, the effect of feedback frequency on weight loss was no longer significant. Feedback frequency had a significant indirect effect on weight loss through self-monitoring adherence. Conclusion Self-monitoring adherence mediated the effect of feedback frequency on weight loss. Increasing the frequency with which participants receive feedback could enhance self-monitoring adherence, a critical component of behavioral weight-loss treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12529-012-9259-9

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [2]Burke LE Warziski M Styn MA Music E Hudson AG Sereika SM A randomized clinical trial of a standard versus vegetarian diet for weight loss: the impact of treatment preference Int J Obes 2008 32 166 176 17700579
  2. [3]Carels RA Young KM Wott CB Weight bias and weight loss treatment outcomes in treatment-seeking adults Ann Behav Med 2009 37 3 350 355 19548044 PMC3538814
  3. [4]Franz MJ Vanwormer JJ Crain AL Weight-loss outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of weight-loss clinical trials with a minimum 1-year follow-up J Am Diet Assoc 2007 107 10 1755 1767 17904936
  4. [5]Stolley MR Fitzgibbon ML Schiffer L Obesity Reduction Black Intervention Trial (ORBIT): Six-month results Obesity 2008 17 100 106 18997671 PMC3888450
  5. [9]Krukowski RA Harvey-Berino J Ashikaga T Thomas CS Micco N Internet-based weight control: the relationship between web features and weight loss Telemed J E Health 2008 14 8 775 782 18954247 PMC2998280
  6. [11]Haapala I Barengo NC Biggs S Surakka L Manninen P Weight loss by mobile phone: a 1-year effectiveness study Public Health Nutr 2009 12 12 2382 2391 19323865
  7. [13]Wadden TA Berkowitz RI Womble LG Randomized trial of lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy for obesity New Engl J Med 2005 353 20 2111 2120 16291981
  8. [15]Lubans D Morgan P Collins C Warren J Callister R Exploring the mechanisms of weight loss in the SHED-IT intervention for overweight men: A mediation analysis Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2009 6 1 76 19922613 PMC2784746
  9. [16]Webber KH Tate DF Ward DS Bowling JM Motivation and its relationship to adherence to self-monitoring and weight loss in a 16-week Internet behavioral weight loss intervention J Nutr Educ Behav 2010 42 3 161 167 20138583
  10. [17]Burke LE Styn MA Glanz K SMART trial: A randomized clinical trial of self-monitoring in behavioral weight management-design and baseline findings Contemp Clin Trials 2009 30 6 540 551 19665588 PMC2860431
  11. [18]Burke LE Conroy MB Sereika SM The effect of electronic self-monitoring on weight loss and dietary intake: A randomized behavioral weight loss trial Obesity 2011 19 2 338 344 20847736 PMC3268702
  12. [19]Wadden TA Berkowitz RI Sarwer DB Prus-Wisniewski R Steinberg C Benefits of lifestyle modification in the pharmacologic treatment of obesity: a randomized trial Arch Intern Med 2001 161 2 218 227 11176735
  13. [21]Preacher KJ Hayes AF SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2004 36 4 717 731 15641418
  14. [23]Andrade AM Coutinho SR Silva MN The effect of physical activity on weight loss is mediated by eating self-regulation Patient Educ Couns 2010 79 3 320 326 20149955
  15. [25]Silva MN Markland D Carraca EV Exercise autonomous motivation predicts 3-yr weight loss in women Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011 43 4 728 737 20689448
  16. [26]Perri MG Nezu AM McKelvey WF Shermer RL Renjilian DA Viegener BJ Relapse prevention training and problem-solving therapy in the long-term management of obesity J Consult Clin Psychol 2001 69 4 722 726 11550740
  17. [27]Coons MJ Roehrig M Spring B The potential of virtual reality technologies to improve adherence to weight loss behaviors J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011 5 2 340 344 21527103 PMC3125926
  18. [28]Gerber BS Stolley MR Thompson AL Sharp LK Fitzgibbon ML Mobile phone text messaging to promote healthy behaviors and weight loss maintenance: A feasibility study Health Informatics J 2009 15 1 17 25 19218309 PMC2730665
  19. [30]Hurling R Catt M Boni MD Using internet and mobile phone technology to deliver an automated physical activity program: Randomized controlled trial J Med Internet Res 2007 9 2 e7 17478409 PMC1874722
  20. [31]Tate DF Jackvony EH Wing RR A randomized trial comparing human e-mail counseling, computer-automated tailored counseling, and no counseling in an Internet weight loss program Arch Intern Med 2006 166 1620 1625 16908795

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Turk, M. W., Elci, O. U., Wang, J., Sereika, S. M., Ewing, L. J., Acharya, S. D., Glanz, K., & Burke, L. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2012-09-01
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
556-561
ISSN
  • 1070-5503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7558
OpenAlex
W2077063656
Cited by
66
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 2
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000005)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (F31NR009750, P30NR003924, P30-NR-03924, K24NR010742)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-DK71817, R01DK071817)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000056, UL1RR024153, 5 MO1 RR 00056)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
self-monitoring, weight loss, feedback frequency, behavioral weight loss, personal digital assistants, mediation, SMART trial
MeSH terms
Adult, Diet, Feedback, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Self Care, Weight Loss, Health Behavior, Body Mass Index, Computers, Handheld, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review