Cited by 154Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMobile Learning in EducationDigital Mental Health Interventions

Mobile Health Applications in Weight Management: A Systematic Literature Review

Open access
Dounavi, Katerina, Tsoumani, Olga·2019·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

CONTEXT: Weight management is an effective strategy for controlling chronic disease and maintaining physical health, and research on this topic has risen dramatically over the past four decades. The present systematic literature review aimed to identify existing evidence on the efficacy of mobile health technology in facilitating weight management behaviors, such as healthy food consumption and physical activity. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid PsycINFO databases with the aim to identify studies published in peer-reviewed journal articles between 2012 and 2017. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 39 studies were analyzed in spring 2018 and are presented here in terms of participant characteristics, effective technology components, additional treatments, impact on health-related behaviors, and treatment efficacy. Indicators of study quality and social validity are also provided. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile health apps are widely considered as satisfactory, easy to use, and helpful in the pursuit of weight loss goals by patients. The potential of mobile health apps in facilitating weight loss lies in their ability to increase treatment adherence through strategies such as self-monitoring. These findings indicate that satisfactory treatment adherence and consequent weight loss and maintenance are achieved in the presence of high levels of engagement with a mobile health app. The research quality assessment of RCTs reveals a great need for following international standards both when conducting and reporting research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.12.005

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dounavi, K., & Tsoumani, O.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
Corresponding author
Dounavi, Katerina
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
894-903
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2904299939
Cited by
154
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (acceptedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mobile health apps, weight management, weight loss, weight maintenance, healthy eating, physical activity, self-monitoring, medication adherence, user engagement, chronic disease prevention
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Body Weight, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Patient Compliance, Weight Loss, Health Behavior, Exercise, Body Mass Index, Weight Reduction Programs, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review