Cited by 58Face Recognition and PerceptionSocial Robot Interaction and HRIEmotion and Mood Recognition

Exaggerating facial expressions: a way to intensify emotion or a way to the uncanny valley?

Mäkäräinen, Meeri, Kätsyri, Jari, Takala, Tapio·2014·Cognitive Computation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12559-014-9273-0

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mäkäräinen, M., Kätsyri, J., & Takala, T.
Affiliations
Aalto University (FI)
Corresponding author
Mäkäräinen, Meeri
Venue
Cognitive Computation
Published
2014-05-10
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
708-721
ISSN
  • 1866-9956 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-9964
OpenAlex
W2042744116
Cited by
58
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Computation (publishedVersion)
Funders
Center for Information Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
Keywords
uncanny valley, emotional intensity, artificial faces, animation, robotics, schematic faces, emotion perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review