Cited by 46Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchTechnology Use by Older AdultsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Recommendations for ICT use in Alzheimer's disease assessment: Monaco CTAD expert meeting

Open access
Robert, Philippe H., Konig, A., Andrieu, S., Bremond, F., Chemin, I., Chung, P.C., Dartigues, J.F., Dubois, B. +8 more·2013·The Journal of nutrition, health and aging

Abstract

Alzheimer disease (AD) and other related dementia represent a major challenge for health care systems within the aging population. It is therefore important to develop better instruments for assessing disease severity and disease progression to optimize patient's care and support to care providers, and also provide better tools for clinical research. In this area, Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) are of particular interest. Such techniques enable accurate and standardized assessments of patients' performance and actions in real time and real life situations. The aim of this article is to provide basic recommendation concerning the development and the use of ICT for Alzheimer's disease and related disorders. During he ICT and Mental Health workshop (CTAD meeting held in Monaco on the 30th October 2012) an expert panel was set up to prepare the first recommendations for the use of ICT in dementia research. The expert panel included geriatrician, epidemiologist, neurologist, psychiatrist, psychologist, ICT engineers, representatives from the industry and patient association. The recommendations are divided into three sections corresponding to 1/ the clinical targets of interest for the use of ICT, 2/ the conditions, the type of sensors and the outputs (scores) that could be used and obtained, 3/ finally the last section concerns specifically the use of ICT within clinical trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12603-013-0046-3

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [40]Yesavage JA Friedman L Kraemer HC Noda A Wicks D Bliwise DL Sheikh J Tinklenberg J Zarcone V A follow-up study of actigraphic measures in home-residing Alzheimer’s disease patients J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 11 1 1998 7 10 PubMed PMID: 9686746 9686746
  2. [42]Nagels G Engelborghs S Vloeberghs E Van Dam D Pickut BA De Deyn PP Actigraphic measurement of agitated behaviour in dementia Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 21 4 2006 388 393 10.1002/gps.1483 PubMed PMID: 16534768 16534768 · DOI
  3. [66]Computer, 2005, 38, 50–60
  4. [71]Matsuoka K, Aware home understanding life activities. Towards a humanfriendly assistive environment. International conference on smart homes and health telematics, 2004
  5. [76]Woolham J Frisby B How techology can help people feel safe at home Journal of Dementia Care 10 2 2002 27 29
  6. [78]Marsh J House Calls Rochester Review 64 3 2002 22 26

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Robert, P. H., Konig, A., Andrieu, S., Bremond, F., Chemin, I., Chung, P. C., Dartigues, J. F., Dubois, B., Feutren, G., Guillemaud, R., Kenisberg, P. A., Nave, S., Vellas, B., Verhey, F., Yesavage, J., & Mallea, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice (FR)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
  • Fondation Alzheimer (FR)
  • Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US)
Corresponding author
Robert, Philippe H.
Venue
The Journal of nutrition, health and aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
653-660
ISSN
1279-7707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038060710
Cited by
46
References
84
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The journal of nutrition health & aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-TECS-0016)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, dementia, information and communication technologies, dementia assessment, disease severity, disease progression, wearable sensors, real-time assessment, clinical trials, expert recommendations
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Clinical Trials as Topic, Communication, Congresses as Topic, Dementia, Humans, Monaco, Monitoring, Physiologic, Psychometrics, Research Design, Severity of Illness Index, Task Performance and Analysis, Technology, Geriatric Assessment, Guidelines as Topic, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review