Cited by 44Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsAcute Ischemic Stroke Management

Actigraphy – A Useful Tool for Motor Activity Monitoring in Stroke Patients

Reiterer, Veronika, Sauter, Cornelia, Klösch, Gerhard, Lalouschek, Wolfgang, Zeitlhofer, Josef·2008·European Neurology

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the present study was the evaluation of actigraphy as a tool to objectify the recovery process after motor paresis due to stroke. Methods: The motor activity of both arms of patients suffering from stroke was actigraphically recorded at four different time points during the course of rehabilitation: 24–36 h, 5–7 days, 3 months, and 6 months after stroke. Results: Motor activity monitored by wrist-worn actigraphs located at the impaired side revealed an increase in activity between the first two time points and the subsequent ones. Additionally, actigraphic recordings showed lower total motor activity at the impaired side as compared to the nonimpaired side. A significant positive correlation was found between the actigraphically recorded motor activity and the results of the Scandinavian Stroke scale, the Barthel Index, the Rankin Scale Score and with the Motoricity Index during the 1st week, which corresponds to the time when neurological deficits were most pronounced. Conclusion: Our results suggest that actigraphy is a useful tool in the objective evaluation of motor activity after stroke. Moreover, actigraphy covers additional aspects that are not reflected by the usual stroke scales in a clinical situation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000157882

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The eight studies identified have demonstrated that accelerometry can be systematically applied as a method for measuring overall upper extremity activity.

    “The eight studies identified for the present review, including a large multicentre clinical trial (n = 222) [14] and a prospective randomised controlled trial (n = 20) [17], have demonstrated that accelerometry can be systematically applied as a method for measuring overall upper extremity activity.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reiterer, V., Sauter, C., Klösch, G., Lalouschek, W., & Zeitlhofer, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Venue
European Neurology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2008
Volume
60
Issue
6
Pages
285-291
ISSN
  • 0014-3022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9913
OpenAlex
W1993914336
Cited by
44
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Keywords
actigraphy, stroke, motor paresis, motor activity monitoring, stroke rehabilitation, Scandinavian Stroke Scale, Barthel Index, modified Rankin Scale
MeSH terms
Stroke Rehabilitation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Motor Activity, Paresis, Wrist, Muscle, Skeletal, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review