Cited by 27Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsHand Gesture Recognition SystemsGait Recognition and Analysis

A unified generative model using generative adversarial network for activity recognition

Chan, Mang Hong, Noor, Mohd Halim Mohd·2021·Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12652-020-02548-0

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, M. H., & Noor, M. H. M.
Affiliations
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Noor, Mohd Halim Mohd
Venue
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing
Published
2020-09-19
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
8119-8128
ISSN
  • 1868-5137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-5145
OpenAlex
W3087753247
Cited by
27
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universiti Sains Malaysia (304/PKOMP/6315206)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
human activity recognition, generative adversarial networks, synthetic data generation, data augmentation, generative models, sensor data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review