Cited by 40Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsImbalanced Data Classification TechniquesGait Recognition and Analysis

Synthetic Sensor Data for Human Activity Recognition

Alharbi, Fayez, Ouarbya, Lahcen, Ward, Jamie A·2020·2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)

Abstract

Human activity recognition (HAR) based on wearable sensors has emerged as an active topic of research in machine learning and human behavior analysis because of its applications in several fields, including health, security and surveillance, and remote monitoring. Machine learning algorithms are frequently applied in HAR systems to learn from labeled sensor data. The effectiveness of these algorithms generally relies on having access to lots of accurately labeled training data. But labeled data for HAR is hard to come by and is often heavily imbalanced in favor of one or other dominant classes, which in turn leads to poor recognition performance. In this study we introduce a generative adversarial network (GAN)-based approach for HAR that we use to automatically synthesize balanced and realistic sensor data. GANs are robust generative networks, typically used to create synthetic images that cannot be distinguished from real images. Here we explore and construct a model for generating several types of human activity sensor data using a Wasserstein GAN (WGAN). We assess the synthetic data using two commonly-used classifier models, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). We evaluate the quality and diversity of the synthetic data by training on synthetic data and testing on real sensor data, and vice versa. We then use synthetic sensor data to oversample the imbalanced training set. We demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method on two publicly available human activity datasets, the Sussex-Huawei Locomotion (SHL) and Smoking Activity Dataset (SAD). We achieve improvements of using WGAN augmented training data over the imbalanced case, for both SHL (0.85 to 0.95 F1-score), and for SAD (0.70 to 0.77 F1-score) when using a CNN activity classifier.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/ijcnn48605.2020.9206624

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alharbi, F., Ouarbya, L., & Ward, J. A.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Venue
2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-07
Pages
1-9
ISSN
2161-4407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3028846921
Cited by
40
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.62
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
human activity recognition, synthetic sensor data, generative adversarial networks, Wasserstein GAN, data augmentation, class imbalance, oversampling, wearable sensors, convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review