Selective adsorption of lithium ions from Urmia Lake onto aluminum hydroxide
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Heidari and Momeni (2017) conducted experimental studies on Li recovery from Urmia lake using lithium aluminate.
“Furthermore, Heidari and Momeni (2017) conducted experimental studies on Li recovery from Urmia lake using lithium aluminate.”
From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Heidari and Momeni, 2017
The high Mg2+/Li+ mass ratios did not impact either sample's Li+ adsorption or desorption process.
“Also, the high Mg 2+ /Li + mass ratios did not impact either sample ' s Li + adsorption or desorption process.”
From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Heidari and Momeni (2017)
The second Urmia Lake water sample had a Li+ concentration of 0.055 ppm and an approximated Mg2+/Li+ mass ratio of 207.
“The second sample had a Li + concentration of 0.055 ppm and an approximated Mg 2+ /Li + mass ratio of 207.”
From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Heidari and Momeni, 2017
The first Urmia Lake water sample had a Li+ concentration of 0.038 ppm and an approximated Mg2+/Li+ mass ratio of 326.
“The fi rst sample had a Li + concentration of 0.038 ppm and an approximated Mg 2+ /Li + mass ratio of 326.”
From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Heidari and Momeni, 2017
The efficiency of the Li+ adsorption process improves with increasing Li+ concentration.
“Finally, the ef fi ciency of the Li + adsorption process improves with increasing Li + concentration, as seen in the percent recovery of the two samples.”
From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Heidari and Momeni (2017)
Li+ adsorption is reduced when temperatures exceed 30°C.
“Heidari and Momeni (2017) indicate Li + adsorption is reduced when temperatures exceed 30 ° C.”
From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Heidari and Momeni (2017)
The maximum Li recovery from both samples occurred at a pH of 7.5.
“The maximum Li recovery from both samples occurred at a pH of 7.5.”
From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Heidari and Momeni (2017)
The sample with the highest Li+ concentration, 0.055 ppm, had a percent recovery of 76.4%, whereas the sample with 0.038 ppm Li+ concentration had a percent recovery of 71%.
“The sample with the highest Li + concentration, 0.055 ppm, had a percent recovery of 76.4%, whereas the sample with 0.038 ppm Li + concentration had a percent recovery of 71%.”
From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Heidari and Momeni (2017)
Both samples tested are high Mg2+/Li+ and low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions.
“Therefore, both samples are high Mg 2+ /Li + and low Li + concentration aqueous solutions.”
From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Heidari and Momeni (2017)
Cites
A Review of Extractive Processes for Lithium from Ores and Brines
Averill, W. A., & Olson, D. L. (1978) · Energy · doi:10.1016/0360-5442(78)90027-0 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Systematic Review of Lithium Extraction from Salt-Lake Brines via Precipitation Approaches
Zhang, Y., Hu, Y., Wang, L., & Sun, W. (2019) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2019.105868 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Lithium recovery from brine: Recent developments and challenges
Khalil, A., Mohammed, S., Hashaikeh, R., & Hilal, N. (2022) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2022.115611 · Cited by 396 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Sun, W., Hu, Y., & Tang, H. (2020) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2019.09.002 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions
Murphy, O., & Haji, M. N. (2022) · Frontiers in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.3389/fceng.2022.1008680 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
“aqueous solutions in experiments dating back to 1960 (Goodenough, 1960; Goodenough and Stenger, 1961; Kaplan, 1963; Pelly, 1978; Epstein et al., 1981; Isupov et al., 1999; Hamzaoui et al., 2007; Hamzaoui et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2013; Li et al., 2015; Heidari and Momeni, 2017; Liu et al., 2018).”
BackgroundNikkhah, H., Ipekçi, D., Xiang, W., Stoll, Z., Xu, P., Li, B., McCutcheon, J. R., & Beykal, B. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.155349 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Reich, R., Slunitschek, K., Danisi, R. M., Eiche, E., & Kolb, J. (2023) · Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review · doi:10.1080/08827508.2022.2047041 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
- Authors
- Heidari, N., & Momeni, P.
- Affiliations
- Urmia University (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Heidari, N.
- ORCID
- Heidari, N.
- Venue
- Environmental Earth Sciences
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 16
- ISSN
- 1866-6280 (ISSN-L)
- 1866-6299
- OpenAlex
- W2749933319
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Environmental Earth Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Urmia University (IR) (1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
- Keywords
- lithium recovery, lithium adsorption, aluminum hydroxide, Lake Urmia, LiAlO2, brine, co-precipitation, adsorption isotherms, Langmuir isotherm, Freundlich isotherm, Dubinin-Radushkevich isotherm, Temkin isotherm, lithium desorption, sulfuric acid, pH effect, temperature effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review