Cited by 408Extraction and Separation ProcessesMolten salt chemistry and electrochemical processesChemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions

Systematic Review of Lithium Extraction from Salt-Lake Brines via Precipitation Approaches

Zhang, Ye, Hu, Yuehua, Wang, Li, Sun, Wei·2019·Minerals Engineering

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mineng.2019.105868

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Conventional brine extraction requires additional processing to achieve comparable purity, with initial product purity ranging from 50 to 80% wt.

    “Conversely, additional processing is required to achieve comparable purity with conventional brine extraction, where initial product purity ranges from 50 to 80% wt (Zhang et al., 2019).”
  • Carbonate brine types have been the most economical and sustainable Li+ extraction resources for traditional evaporation and precipitation extraction methods due to their low Mg2+/Li+ mass ratios and higher Li+ concentrations relative to the other solutions.

    “Carbonate brine types have been the most economical and sustainable Li + extraction resources for traditional evaporation and precipitation extraction methods due to their low -Mg 2+ /Li + mass ratios and higher Li + concentrations relative to the other solutions (Li et al., 2019b; Zhang et al., 2019).”
  • As of 2021, the worldwide Li reserves from ores and brines total an estimated 22 Mt.

    “As of 2021, the worldwide Li reserves from ores and brines total an estimated 22 Mt.”
  • Salt lake brines account for almost 80% of the worldwide Li reserves from ores and brines.

    “Salt lake brines account for almost 80% of this total (Zhang et al., 2019).”
  • The purity of lithium extracted from conventional brine methods is only around 50-80%, requiring further processing to achieve similar purity levels.

    “However, the purity of lithium extracted from conventional brine methods is only around 50-80%, requiring further processing to achieve similar purity levels [37].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Hu, Y., Wang, L., & Sun, W.
Affiliations
Central South University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Li
  • Sun, Wei
Venue
Minerals Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
139
Pages
105868
ISSN
0892-6875 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2956940915
Cited by
408
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Minerals Engineering (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
Keywords
lithium recovery, salt lake brine, precipitation chemistry, magnesium precipitation, lithium-magnesium separation, pH, temperature, green extraction, economic feasibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review