CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 124Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStudent Stress and CopingDigital Mental Health Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mindfulness for the Mental Health and Well-Being of Post-Secondary Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Halladay, Jillian E., Dawdy, Jamie L., McNamara, Isabella F., Chen, Allison J., Vitoroulis, Irene, McInnes, Natalia, Munn, Catharine·2019·Mindfulness
DOI 10.1007/s12671-018-0979-z
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-018-0979-z

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 81 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Aeamla-Or, N. (2015). Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on stress, depression, self-esteem, and mindfulness in Thai nursing students: A randomized controlled trial (Doctoral dissertation). University of New Castle, Callaghan, Australia.
  2. Blevins, N. C. (2008). Mindfulness meditation as an intervention for body image and weight management in college women: A pilot study (Doctoral dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
  3. Deeks, J.J. & Higgins, J.P.T. (2010). Statistical algorithms in review manager 5. Statistical Methods Group of The Cochrane Collaboration.
  4. Greer, C. (2015). An online mindfulness intervention to reduce stress and anxiety among college students (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minnesota, United States of America.
  5. Higgins, J.P.T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved from www.handbook.cochrane.org
  6. Schünemann, H., Brożek, J., Guyatt, G., & Oxman, A. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook for Grading the Quality of Evidence and the Strength of Recommendations using the GRADE Approach. Hamilton, ON, Canada: The GRADE Working Group.
  7. The Cochrane Collaboration. (2014). Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre.
  8. Walsh, E. C. (2014). Effects of a short-term mindfulness intervention on depression and immune function (Doctoral dissertation). University of Kentucky, Lexington, United States of America.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–124 of 124

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Halladay, J. E., Dawdy, J. L., McNamara, I. F., Chen, A. J., Vitoroulis, I., McInnes, N., & Munn, C.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Halladay, Jillian E.
ORCID
Venue
Mindfulness
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-06-28
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
397-414
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
DOI
10.1007/s12671-018-0979-z
OpenAlex
W2810043854
Cited by
124
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, postsecondary students, student mental health, depression, anxiety, perceived stress, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, intervention duration, brief intervention, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review