Cited by 30Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsResilience and Mental HealthStudent Stress and Coping

Nonreactivity and resilience to stress: Gauging the mindfulness of African American college students

Freligh, Charles B., Debb, Scott M.·2019·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-019-01203-w

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freligh, C. B., & Debb, S. M.
Affiliations
Norfolk State University (US)
Corresponding author
Freligh, Charles B.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2019-07-31
Volume
10
Issue
11
Pages
2302-2311
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2966609161
Cited by
30
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
resilience, non-reactivity, African American college students, historically Black colleges and universities, racial stress, Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, Brief Resilience Scale, mindfulness-based interventions, social exclusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review