Cited by 113Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStudent Stress and CopingPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Mindfulness and the College Transition: The Efficacy of an Adapted Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Intervention in Fostering Adjustment among First-Year Students

Ramler, Taylor R., Tennison, Linda R., Lynch, Julie, Murphy, Patsy·2016·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-015-0398-3

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ramler, T. R., Tennison, L. R., Lynch, J., & Murphy, P.
Affiliations
College of Saint Benedict and Saint John's University (US)
Corresponding author
Tennison, Linda R.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2015-03-12
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
179-188
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2098827317
Cited by
113
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
FWCI
9.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, transition to college, first-year students, student adaptation, stress, salivary cortisol, physiological stress, gender differences, well-being, adapted interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review