CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 145Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and Memory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Does Mindfulness Meditation Training Enhance Executive Control? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials in Adults

Open access
Cásedas, Luis, Pirruccio, Vincenzo, Vadillo, Miguel A., Lupiáñez, Juan·2020·Mindfulness
DOI 10.1007/s12671-019-01279-4

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Over the last years, mindfulness meditation has been claimed to be effective in enhancing several cognitive domains, including executive control. However, these claims have been mostly based on findings pertaining to case-control and cross-sectional studies, which are by nature unable to reveal causal relationships. Aiming to address this issue, we set out to conduct the first quantitative assessment of the literature concerning mindfulness meditation as an enhancer for executive control considering only randomized controlled studies. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis covering experimental studies testing the effect of mindfulness meditation training on at least one executive control function (working memory, inhibitory control, or cognitive flexibility) in adult samples. Four databases were examined, resulting in the identification of 822 candidate references. After a systematic filtering process, a set of 16 studies was retained for evaluation, of which 13 could be included in a subsequent meta-analysis. We found an average effect size of g = 0.34 [0.16, 0.51], indicating a small-to-medium effect of mindfulness meditation training in enhancing executive control. Effect sizes for individual functions were g = 0.42 [0.10, 0.74] for working memory, g = 0.42 [0.20, 0.63] for inhibitory control, and g = 0.09 [−0.13, 0.31] for cognitive flexibility. Funnel plot asymmetry analysis revealed no evidence of publication bias. Taken together, our findings provide preliminary and moderate yet positive evidence supporting the enhancing effects of mindfulness meditation on executive control. Shortcomings of included studies and considerations for future empirical and meta-analytical research are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-019-01279-4

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cochrane Collaboration. (2014). Review manager (RevMan) [computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–145 of 145

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cásedas, L., Pirruccio, V., Vadillo, M. A., & Lupiáñez, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Cásedas, Luis
ORCID
Venue
Mindfulness
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-12-10
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
411-424
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
DOI
10.1007/s12671-019-01279-4
OpenAlex
W2996125253
Cited by
145
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • "la Caixa" Foundation (LCF/BQ/ES18/11670002)
  • Comunidad de Madrid (2016-T1/SOC-1395)
  • Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad. (PSI2017-85159-P)
  • from the Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (PSI2017-84926-P)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
mindfulness meditation, executive function, working memory, inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, meditation training, cognitive enhancement, adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review