Cited by 47Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumDigital Mental Health Interventions

A Randomized Controlled Trial of an Online, Compassion-Based Intervention for Maternal Psychological Well-Being in the First Year Postpartum

Gammer, Isobel, Hartley-Jones, Charlotte, Jones, Fergal W.·2020·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-020-01306-9

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gammer, I., Hartley-Jones, C., & Jones, F. W.
Affiliations
  • Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
Corresponding author
Jones, Fergal W.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2020-01-17
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
928-939
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2999129569
Cited by
47
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
self-compassion, compassion-based interventions, online self-help intervention, maternal psychological well-being, low-intensity intervention, attrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review