Cited by 546Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Psychotherapeutic benefits of compassion-focused therapy: an early systematic review

Open access
Leaviss, J., Uttley, L.·2015·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compassion-focused therapy (CFT) is a relatively novel form of psychotherapy that was developed for people who have mental health problems primarily linked to high shame and self-criticism. The aim of this early systematic review was to draw together the current research evidence of the effectiveness of CFT as a psychotherapeutic intervention, and to provide recommendations that may inform the development of further trials. METHOD: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was undertaken to systematically identify literature relating to the effectiveness of CFT as a psychotherapeutic intervention. Reference lists of key journals were hand searched and contact with experts in the field was made to identify unpublished data. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the review, including three randomized controlled studies. The findings from the included studies were, in the most part, favourable to CFT, and in particular seemed to be effective for people who were high in self-criticism. CONCLUSIONS: CFT shows promise as an intervention for mood disorders, particularly those high in self-criticism. However, more large-scale, high-quality trials are needed before it can be considered evidence-based practice. The review highlights issues from the current evidence that may be used to inform such trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291714002141

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A number of studies have provided empirical evidence for CFT's effectiveness in treating a range of conditions, including mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, and OCD.

    “A number of studies have provided empirical evidence for CFT’s effectiveness in treating a range of conditions, including mood and anxiety disorders (Leaviss and Uttley, 2015; Wilson et al., 2018), substance use disorders (Held et al., 2018), and OCD (Petrocchi et al., 2021).”

    From Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of compassion-focused acceptance and commitment therapy delivered via telehealth in a community behavioral health clinic (2025) · cites this paper as Leaviss and Uttley, 2015

    The Results report improved depression in some studies, and the Method table describes significant improvements in a mixed-diagnosis CFT group that included people with depression and anxiety. But the Results also report no between-group difference in anxiety in one study, and the Conclusions say larger, higher-quality trials are needed. The review therefore supports preliminary evidence for mood symptoms, but not a firm claim of effectiveness for anxiety disorders. Substance use disorders and OCD have separate citations in the citing sentence and are not assessed here. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pre-treatment shame proneness was not as consistently connected to treatment effect in this study.

    “Pre-treatment shame proneness, which has been demonstrated to be correlated with self-compassion/self-criticism and has also been shown to be a predictor of response to compassion-focused interventions (Leaviss and Uttley, 2015), was not as consistently connected to treatment effect in this study.”

    From Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of compassion-focused acceptance and commitment therapy delivered via telehealth in a community behavioral health clinic (2025) · cites this paper as Leaviss and Uttley, 2015

    The Results > Moderators section reports that baseline self-criticism and related traits moderated responses to compassion-focused interventions. The paper discusses shame alongside self-criticism, but the passages do not establish that pre-treatment shame proneness itself predicts response or report its correlation with self-compassion or self-criticism. The final comparison with ‘this study’ is the citing authors’ own finding, not a claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Leaviss and Uttley [72] demonstrated that CFT yields multiple therapeutic advantages, especially for individuals characterized by high self-criticism, such as maladaptive perfectionists.

    “Notably, Leaviss and Uttley [72] demonstrated that CFT yields multiple therapeutic advantages, especially for individuals characterized by high self-criticism, such as maladaptive perfectionists.”

    From The Influence of Positive and Negative Aspects of Perfectionism on Psychological Distress in Emerging Adulthood: Exploring the Mediating Role of Self-Compassion (2023) · cites this paper as [72]

    The Discussion (‘Specificity of effects of CFT’) reports greater symptom improvement among highly self-critical individuals, and the Conclusions say CFT shows promise for them. But the review does not identify maladaptive perfectionists as a studied group, and its cautious conclusions do not establish therapeutic advantages for that group. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • CFT and CMT have been shown to reduce suffering and improve quality of life in a range of health problems such as anxiety/depression, eating disorders, phobias and pain management.

    “CFT and CMT have been shown to reduce suffering and improve QoL in a range of health problems such as anxiety/depression, eating disorders, phobias and pain management30–33”

    From SafeSpace: what is the feasibility and acceptability of a codesigned virtual reality intervention, incorporating compassionate mind training, to support people undergoing cancer treatment in a clinical setting? (2022) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Results and Method table report improvements in psychological well-being, anxiety/depression measures, and eating-disorder outcomes in studies of CFT or CMT. The Discussion’s “Quality of evidence” section cautions that evidence is insufficient to establish superiority over standard treatments. The passages do not establish improved quality of life or benefits for phobias or pain management, so the full range of outcomes and conditions claimed is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The earliest review of self-compassion-related therapies concluded that treatment effectiveness was difficult to evaluate given methodological weaknesses in the field (Leaviss and Uttley 2015).

    “While the earliest review of selfcompassion-related therapies concluded that treatment effectiveness was difficult to evaluate given methodological weaknesses in the field (Leaviss and Uttley 2015)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leaviss, J., & Uttley, L.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Leaviss, J.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2014-09-12
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
927-945
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2150285866
Cited by
546
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
University of Sheffield
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
compassion-focused therapy, shame, self-criticism, mood disorders, treatment efficacy, evidence-based practice
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Empathy, Humans, Psychotherapy, Self Concept, Shame, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review