Cited by 39Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsStudent Stress and Coping

Evaluating Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Self-Help Books for College Student Mental Health

Levin, Michael E., An, Woolee, Davis, Carter H., Twohig, Michael P.·2020·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-020-01344-3

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levin, M. E., An, W., Davis, C. H., & Twohig, M. P.
Affiliations
Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Levin, Michael E.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2020-02-21
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
1275-1285
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W3006164931
Cited by
39
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, mindfulness-based stress reduction, self-help books, college student mental health, psychological inflexibility, cognitive fusion, valued action, psychological distress, positive mental health, academic distress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review