Cited by 21Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsEthics in Clinical ResearchLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy

A systematic review of inclusion of minoritized populations in randomized controlled trials of acceptance and commitment therapy

Misra, Akshay, Bryan, Ashley, S. Faber, Naomi, Printz Pereira, Destiny, Faber, Sonya, T. Williams, Monnica, D. Skinta, Matthew·2023·Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jcbs.2023.05.008

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Misra, A., Bryan, A., S. Faber, N., Printz Pereira, D., Faber, S., T. Williams, M., & D. Skinta, M.
Affiliations
  • Roosevelt University (US)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Misra, Akshay
Venue
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-07
Volume
29
Pages
122-130
ISSN
2212-1447 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4381620834
Cited by
21
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, underrepresentation in clinical trials, generalizability of research findings, Black participants, Asian participants, sexual orientation, gender identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review