Cited by 73Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Cognitive Behavioral Mobile Applications: Clinical Studies, Marketplace Overview, and Research Agenda

Torous, John, Levin, Michael E., Ahern, David K., Oser, Megan L.·2017·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2016.05.007

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Torous, J., Levin, M. E., Ahern, D. K., & Oser, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Utah State University (US)
Corresponding author
Oser, Megan L.
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
215-225
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2430998563
Cited by
73
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1
FWCI
16.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, mobile health, mobile application, digital mental health interventions, dialectical behavior therapy, behavioral activation, acceptance and commitment therapy, app store analysis, feasibility and efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review