Cited by 36Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Differential contribution of the five facets of mindfulness to well-being and psychological distress

Roemer, Anja, Sutton, Anna, Grimm, Carsten, Medvedev, Oleg N.·2021·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-020-01535-y

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roemer, A., Sutton, A., Grimm, C., & Medvedev, O. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Waikato (NZ)
  • New Zealand Defence Force (NZ)
Corresponding author
Roemer, Anja
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2020-11-05
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
693-700
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W3094982108
Cited by
36
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Funders
New Zealand Defence Force
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, trait mindfulness, well-being, psychological distress, non-reactivity, description, acting with awareness, individual differences, mindfulness-based interventions, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review