Cited by 6Smoking Behavior and CessationMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Recruitment and initial interest of men in yoga for smoking cessation: QuitStrong, a randomized control pilot study

Open access
Gaskins, Ronnesia B., Jennings, Ernestine G., Thind, Herpreet, Fava, Joseph L., Horowitz, Santina, Lantini, Ryan, Becker, Bruce M., Bock, Beth C.·2015·Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Innovative treatments like yoga for men's smoking cessation (SC) are lacking. To examine the feasibility and acceptability of yoga for men's SC. We randomly assigned eligible men (smoker, ≥5 cigarettes/day, age 18-65) to receive cognitive behavioral therapy for SC, plus a yoga or wellness program. Measures included feasibility (recruitment, class attendance) and acceptability (customer satisfaction). We enrolled 38 of 49 eligible men of 167 screened in response to ads (mean age 39.9 years, ±13.7) who smoked on average 18.6 cigarettes/day (±8.3). Wellness (75.8 %) versus yoga (56 %) men attended more SC classes, p < 0.01. Sixty percent attended ≥1 yoga class. Men reported greater satisfaction with in-house versus community yoga classes. Wellness appears to be the preferred intervention; results indicated that it may be more feasible and showed increased attendance at smoking classes. To be fully feasible, yoga + SC may need to be a unified program offering all classes tailored for men and in the same location.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13142-014-0295-7

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gaskins 2015 observed no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences between conditions, nor any significant group by time interactions, for depression, anxiety, and a composite measure at 8 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months.

    “No statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences between conditions, nor any significant group by time interactions, were observed.”

    From Mindfulness for smoking cessation (2022) · cites this paper as Gaskins 2015

    The Secondary longitudinal analyses section (page unavailable) reports no significant group or group-by-time effects for the depression (CESD), anxiety (STAIT), and PSPP total scores across 8 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. It does not establish that the differences were not clinically meaningful. The finding also should not be extended to smoking outcomes, for which the paper reports a significant group effect. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Gaskins 2015 reported no significant difference in the odds of smoking abstinence between the yoga intervention arm and less intensive comparator arm at six-month follow-up (OR 2.38, 95% CI 0.52 to 10.8, P = 0.265).

    “Gaskins 2015 also reported no significant difference in the odds of smoking abstinence between the intervention arm and less intensive comparator arm at six‐month follow‐up (OR 2.38, 95% CI 0.52 to 10.8, P = 0.265).”

    From Mindfulness for smoking cessation (2022) · cites this paper as Gaskins 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaskins, R. B., Jennings, E. G., Thind, H., Fava, J. L., Horowitz, S., Lantini, R., Becker, B. M., & Bock, B. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Miriam Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gaskins, Ronnesia B.
  • Jennings, Ernestine G.
  • Thind, Herpreet
  • Fava, Joseph L.
  • Horowitz, Santina
  • Becker, Bruce M.
  • Bock, Beth C.
Venue
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Published
2014-10-18
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
177-188
ISSN
  • 1613-9860 (ISSN-L)
  • 1869-6716
OpenAlex
W2031849529
Cited by
6
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R21AT003669)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
yoga, smoking cessation, men, cognitive behavioral therapy, wellness programs, feasibility, acceptability, recruitment (clinical trials), class attendance, customer satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review