Cited by 729Smoking Behavior and CessationPsychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and Validation

Reliability of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire and the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence

Open access
Pomerleau, Cynthia S., Carton, Solange M., Lutzke, Mary L., Flessland, Karen A., Pomerleau, Ovide F.·1994·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the test-retest stability of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ) in two samples: (a) paid subjects in an American laboratory; data were collected via telephone screen and subsequently via questions embedded in a written history; and (b) smokers hospitalized for depression in Paris; data were collected via a written questionnaire upon admission and again after 3 weeks of treatment for depression. Reliability data are also presented for a recently revised version of the FTQ, the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), and compared with FTQ data collected in a subsample of subjects in the American database who received both versions of the questionnaire. Both the FTQ (in both samples) and the FTND proved to be highly reliable. The validity of the scales, using cotinine, number of years smoked, and the "addictive" factor on the Classification of Smoking by Motives questionnaire as criterion variables, was also supported. No relationship between FTQ score and severity of depression was detected in either sample. Internal consistency was somewhat higher for the FTND than for the FTQ, replicating previous findings in the literature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0306-4603(94)90049-3

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pomerleau, C. S., Carton, S. M., Lutzke, M. L., Flessland, K. A., & Pomerleau, O. F.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Pomerleau, Cynthia S.
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
33-39
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003941846
Cited by
729
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 37
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA006529, DA06529)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
Keywords
Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence, nicotine dependence, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, scale validity, cotinine, smoking motivation, depression, hospitalized smokers, questionnaire revision
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Cotinine, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Depressive Disorder, Drug Tolerance, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Michigan, Nicotine, Paris, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Reproducibility of Results, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review