Cited by 110Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeCancer survivorship and careAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

Young adult cancer survivors’ experience with cancer treatment and follow-up care and perceptions of barriers to engaging in recommended care

Open access
Berg, Carla J., Stratton, Erin, Esiashvili, Natia, Mertens, Ann·2016·Journal of Cancer Education

Abstract

We examined correlates of low engagement in the healthcare system, experiences with survivorship care, barriers to follow-up care, and potential resources for promoting follow-up care among young adult survivors of childhood cancers. We conducted a mixed-method study involving surveys of 106 survivors of childhood cancer aged 18-34 recruited from a university-affiliated children's hospital and an NCI-designated cancer center in the Southeastern USA. Phone-based semistructured interviews were then conducted in a subset of 26. Assessments included health factors, psychosocial factors, healthcare system interaction, and interest in resources to promote engagement in healthcare. Survey participants were on average 22.14 (SD = 3.16) years old, 50.0 % female, and 77.4 % White. Overall, 46.0 % had attended survivorship clinic, 47.2 % reported receiving a treatment summary, 68.9 % had a primary care provider, and 17.0 % reported no interaction with healthcare in the past 2 years. Correlates of less than annual healthcare provider visits included being older (p = 0.003), being male (p < 0.001), lack of insurance (p = 0.002), and having had chemotherapy (p = 0.05). Participants reported varied experiences in terms of how health and treatment information was presented, from none or too little to overwhelming or anxiety-provoking amounts. Barriers to engaging in survivorship care included no/limited insurance, time, or transportation; major life changes; anxiety; and difficulty transitioning from pediatrics to adult care. Participants highlighted the need for educational and psychosocial resources, particularly technology-based resources. Multilevel interventions are needed to increase engagement in survivorship care among young adult cancer survivors. Technology-based resources addressing social support and mental well-being are intervention possibilities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13187-015-0853-9

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The scalability of face-to-face survivorship interventions may be limited given the intensive resources involved for the health system and for young adults.

    “their scalability may be limited given the intensive resources involved for both: 1) the health system, which faces limitations regarding skilled personnel and mechanisms to sustain financial support to deliver such interventions; and 2) YAs, who are navigating several life demands during their survivorship period (e.g., re-engaging with family and occupational goals) [44, 45].”

    From A digital, coach-assisted intervention to address the psychosocial needs of young adult cancer survivors: Randomized controlled trial protocol and intervention adaptation process (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Introduction (page not provided) identifies limited provider expertise, clinician preparation time, clinical space, and reimbursement as system-level barriers. The Results (page not provided) report time constraints and life changes, including starting a family or going to college, as barriers for young adults. The paper does not assess the scalability of face-to-face interventions or the resources required to deliver them, so that conclusion goes beyond its findings. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Blatt J Copeland D Bleyer W 1987 Late effects of childhood cancer and its therapy Pizzo P Poplack D Principles and practices of pediatric oncology JB Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia, PA 1303 1329
  2. [15]Commission on Cancer and American College of Surgeons New commission on Cancer accreditation standards gain strong support from four national cancer advocacy organizations Press release issued online August 31, 2011 at http://www.facs.org/news/2011/coc-standards0811.html 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berg, C. J., Stratton, E., Esiashvili, N., & Mertens, A.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
Berg, Carla J.
Venue
Journal of Cancer Education
Published
2015-05-07
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
430-442
ISSN
  • 0885-8195 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-0154
OpenAlex
W1913678855
Cited by
110
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
61.68
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (K07CA139114, P30CA138292)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
young adult cancer survivors, childhood cancer survivors, survivorship care, barriers to health care access, health insurance, transition from pediatric to adult care, psychosocial resources, social support, psychological well-being, treatment summaries
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Adolescent, Adult, Aftercare, Attitude of Health Personnel, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Patient Care Planning, Perception, Prognosis, Survival Rate, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review